Personal Injury Law
Ask a Personal Injury Lawyer. Get an Answer ASAP
Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.A few things to keep in mind. Mediation is non-binding on both parties. throwing out numbers does not obligate either party in any way, although if you throw out something that is too low, they may become unwilling to negotiate higher. It is not yet a situation where they may recognize he severity, they may simply be trying to lower their fees and decrease their costs. They might still be out to try to settle this case for as little as possible so as to likewise avoid legal fees that may begin to pile up.Good luck.
I understand that ultimately, this may be an attempt to avoid a trial and the costs involved, but in my limited experience, insurance companies usually try to toss out some lowball offers before they ask the plaintiff to agree to mediation. I was also under the impression that this mediation would be more like binding arbitration, where both parties would be required to agree to accept the outcome.
Thank you for your follow-up.In terms of your second point, specifically about it being binding--that is something you would need to check with the mediator and your attorney first. Typically the difference between mediation and arbitration is that one is non-binding and the other one is. There are some potentially binding mediation hearings but that has to be disclosed and likewise it does not help to post your offers until and if you are able to evaluate your position. You are likewise absolutely correct that insurers are out to get out as cheaply as they can and they can likewise send out very low offers. You are of course not required to accept them. Hence, if an offer is given out, expect the real number to be somewhere that is 5 to 20 times larger.Good luck.
I think they now know they're in trouble. I'm fully prepared to go to trial, but I assume the judge will expect us to at least try mediation. Isn't that standard procedure these days?
Thank you for your follow-up.That is most definitely standard. The courts are trying to be the last resort after all other options have been exhausted. That likewise includes potential mediation since anything that keeps this case from moving forward saves money and is welcome by the courts.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).