Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.To answer both of your questions directly:1) In California, if your medical bills are paid for a personal injury claim, can you sure for that amount in court --for yourself or to sue to try to get the money reimbursed to your insurance company? and Yes, you can. Typically 'pain and suffering' is 3-5 times the medical bills, and suing for that amount can be done so as to reimburse the medical bills paid out of pocket. At times medical facilities place a lien against a judgment demanding that they be compensated first. In essence he can sue to try to get his medical bills and send those funds back to the facility. 2) Since this may boil down to perception, what documentation would be the most supportive to support or position that the lighting was adequate, railings are not mandated code for temporary seating, thousands of people attend events in this building in similar circumstances and none have decided to step off a side of a riser when they felt the lighting was dim. Is there an argument for contributory negligence and what would be needed to prove it? This isn't a contributory negligence claim unless you can show that he was drunk or intoxicated, since that may indeed create a claim that he assumed the risk of going up the railings and subsequently injured himself. beyond that this isn't contributory at all because he was ultimately a business invitee onto your premises and was entitled to a safe railing and a safe means of being able to go up and down the stairs. What may help you is if you can obtain documentation that showed the premises to be up to code, that there were signs showing that individuals were barred from stepping on the side of the riser, or that there was valid support that he intentionally failed to utilize. This may be the better claim, and while I do see your argument for contributory negligence, if he claims that there was no other way to move back and forth, then it creates the perception that he had no other choice but to move as he did, which affects your claim and weakens your position.Good luck.
Thank you for your follow-up. Your original contributor here.I appreciate the new contributor pointing out that point. What would govern in that instance is the date when he filed, and while it is a valid point to evaluate, from your facts I gathered that he filed before the two year period expired. If that is not correct, please let me know and I will re-edit my answer. If not, then kindly disregard the comment placed by the other professional as it is not relevant or pertinent to your position.Thank you!
Unfortunately for me he filed within 2 days of the expiration.
Thank you for your follow-up.I had a feeling that he did, especially when you mentioned that he had an attorney assisting him with this. What evidence, if any, do you have, that would show that the premises were up to code?
The statutes in the California municipal code do not require handrails for temporary audience/event seating.
We set up the house with at least 2 large aisle ways on either side of riser area.
The occupancy is 160; we set the seating to be at 100. The event box office indicated 50 seats were sold. So the house was 50% full. There should have been more than enough room to leave safely. Sometimes patrons talk or stall on their way down - I think the injured man was impatient so he found another way to exit quicker.
The lighting designer has indicated there was over 2,000 watts of light placed directly and indirectly above the seating area. This came from the light board and
The Stage Manager of the event confirmed the house management protocol was that the studio lights ( large flourescents) were turned on within 1 minute following the event conclusion. This would have flooded the building with light (built to city code) - the time lapse would have been the time took for the stage manager to exit the tech booth area and walk across the room to turn on the house lights. During this transition time, the same 2,000+ watts of pre-show lighting was on
The risers have a raised edge of 2" wood wrapped in yellow and black caution tape.
I do not find any other requirements in the California Municipal Building Code.
The House Manager on site assisted people exiting - the injury happened before he was even out on the floor to do so - so not much.
I can get statements from the lighting designer, stage manager and house manager ( none of whom were working in my employ) indicating the procedure in place to run the event safely. Would it help and what type of statement is allowable in small claims court?
Thank you for your follow-up.Those statements would help tremendously. If you can appear with you in court as witnesses, that would be ideal especially since they are not your employees. That would make them strong witnesses for your claim that he other party failed to utilize reasonable care on his own, and caused his own injuries. Small claims permits witnesses since the other party then has a chance to question and potentially cross-examine their comments and testimony. If you cannot get them to come, have them sign a notarized and witnessed sworn affidavit providing their opinion and information on the night in question, focusing specifically on operation and on how the premises were set up so as to ensure that the premises were as safe as possible for the use of the business invitees. Those are fairly strong witnesses so if you can convince them to come with you, it would really help your case.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).