I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
the problem is, my case is connected to the case where the fraud happened. The fraud has caused delya in both cases various times, and so it is affecting my case negatively. I have been told by two layers that I have no standing to bring up the issue, even though the cases are connected for pre-trial purposes, and the stalls caused to that case are negatively affecting my case. Two lawyers have told me I do have standing. 1) Does it sound like I have standing to address this or not?
2) Regardless, I am amending the complaint to add new parties. While I am at it, I wonder if i cannot address the fraud, or add it to my new complaint, as this stall caused to me has been expensive and time consuming. Is there any such allegation available- such as fraudulent interference?
the affidavit that I allege was fraudulent, was filed in another case that was against the same defendants over the same series of actions that led to the filing of both cases. However, the defendants had filed joint motions to consolidate the two cases, mine and the other plaintiffs, and the Judge granted this motion, and so the cases have been joined for pre-trial purposes. The fraudulent affidavit IS affecting my case, because the aftershocks of that affidavit continue to stall the joined case, as well as my own. It has happened 3 times now, as the adjoined plaintiff has had to seek new counsel, because the fraudulent affidavit had disqualified her chosen lawyer.
That is the basis of standing, that the fraud in that case, is negatively affecting my case, because my case is ties to that case.
ok, that works well then. What is such a motion called? A Motion to unconsolidate the cases?
also as to question number two, is there such a cause of action to add to my complaint? I assume there is not. thank you
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).