I am very sorry for your loss.
I researched your issue earlier and Dimitry asked me to go ahead and post your answer to prevent delay.
Your attorneys are correct. This is an issue that involves a very simple rule of evidence. California Evidence Code 350 and 352 exclude evidence that is not relevant to the issue presented to the jury. (http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=evid&group=00001-01000&file=350-356) Admitting liability is actually a very common defense strategy where liability is clear or the circumstances of the incident may inflame a jury to render an emotionally inflated verdict.
When a defendant admits liability and limits the jury question to damages he/she renders the circumstances of the accident irrelevant. Take a look at Sumrall v. Butler, 102 Cal. App. 2d 515 (http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/calapp2d/102/515.html).
There is one thing that could make the circumstances of the incident relevant. Punitive damages are severely limited in wrongful death actions (they actually must be joined in a separate survival action), however if a plaintiff were to seek punitive damages and survive a motion for summary judgment then it would be possible to create relevant issues that involve the circumstances of the offense. As I have said, punitive damages in wrongful death cases are VERY rare and difficult to maintain, however it is a conversation you should have with your attorney.
This is obviously a very difficult issue.
Please reply if I can help further.
Remember to click ACCEPT only when you are satisfied with your answers. This is how we get paid for our time with your questions. I would also appreciate any positive feedback you could provide. If you are not satisfied then please reply to me so I can further assist you or find someone else to help. I am not your attorney. Therefore no attorney-client relationship exists and any communications on this website are not subject to the attorney-client privilege. For this reason, please do not divulge any personal information and use this site only for hypothetical questions. This forum is for general questions and answers and I cannot provide you with applicable law or legal opinions or advice in your jurisdiction. Please seek the advice of a competent attorney in your jurisdiction. While I can answer general questions and discuss general legal principles, I cannot give you legal advice in your state. The internet is a great place to get general information but should not be seen as a substitute for the attorney-client relationship or the services of a good lawyer in your state.
ok, i appreciate your help. I have another question that may be complicated. I would like to pay for this one and then start another question. lisa
Thank you and good luck!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).