How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Dr. Tim, MD Your Own Question
Dr. Tim, MD
Dr. Tim, MD, Board Cert. OB/GYN
Category: OB GYN
Satisfied Customers: 950
Experience:  General OB/GYN, complicated obstetrics, complicated GYN
Type Your OB GYN Question Here...
Dr. Tim, MD is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

We had a spontaneous conception with no fertility treatment.

Customer Question

Hello. We had a spontaneous conception with no fertility treatment. Age 31. At 8 weeks we had our first ultrasound and it showed one clear sac with a clear fetus and a fuzzy second sac with a very fuzzy to discern fetus. We had another ultrasound at 10 weeks where there was one healthy growing fetus and zero evidence of a second sac or fetus, totally disappeared. We're now at 20 weeks and there is only one fetus. Our doctor attributed this to "vanishing twin syndrome" and said, since it happened in the first trimester, it posed no risks to the remaining baby. I read a number of studies online that said that "vanishing twin syndrome" raises the odds of negative birth outcomes (though those studies involved fertility treatments.) Was looking for guidance on experience with this phenomenon and is there anything more we should do. Our first trimester screening results for Down Syndrome was 1/1700, but it said first trimester screening detects Downs babies only 90 percent of the time. I'm confused by how to interpret the true odds given the 90 percent reading.
Also I'm a little unclear on whether a quad screen is necessary if first trimester screening shows "low" Downs risks.
Submitted: 28 days ago.
Category: OB GYN
Expert:  Dr. Tim, MD replied 28 days ago.

Thank you for the question and I am happy to help.

First, with regard to the 'vanishing twin' phenomenon - this is actually common in the fertility clinics. Perhaps it occurs frequently with non-fertility patients too and one explanation is that:

1. They are increasing the risk of twins with whatever treatment they are pursuing

2. They are performing earlier ultrasounds than are performed in the regular setting

I have tried to find evidence for you of problems related to loss of one twin early in the first trimester and can find no evidence that this is associated with adverse outcomes beyond the risk of miscarriage of the second twin (which currently is not a concern in your case). Loss of a twin in the second or third trimester is a much bigger deal but, again, this does not apply to you. It is perhaps a finding that is related to the fertility clinics and the patients whom they are treating: they are older and perhaps more unhealthy in some cases.

Miscarriages are common and for reasons that we do not know, most of the time. Most twins are not identical, so whatever was wrong with the one twin is very unlikely to be an issue with your 'surviving twin'.

Finally, if you had first trimester sceening that placed the risk of DS that low, then the need for the quad screen seems silly. I do have patients have an AFP drawn at 16 weeks, but this is a screen for spina bifida (unrelated to DS). Yes, it has a sensitivity of picking up a kid with DS of >90%, but it is really just an adjusted odds ratio - your 'odds' are not zero, but they are very low. If you NEED to know for sure if you have a child wit DS, then you can have a test called NIPT drawn (you can google this for more information) but it might be that insurance does not cover it.

Does this answer your question?

Dr. Tim