i was told by my Master sergeant that i had to speak to my commanding officer about my NJP before i was read my njp rights i beileve i have to be informed of an NJP by my senior enlisted leader
the LtCol did not advice me of my rights he asked me to explain my situation after telling him of my situation he then told me I would be read my rights by my Msgt i dont know if this is relavent but he asked me about my situation in front of two other Marines being NJP'd for different incidents.
Under Art 31, UCMJ, it is not proper for a commander to question a suspect about their involvement in a criminal act without first advising them of their right to remain silent.
So what you describe, this was a violation of Art 31, UCMJ.
The remedy for Art 31 violations is that the statement by the accused is excluded from court martial.
Basically, if you refuse NJP and demand court martial, your statement to the commander can be excluded. They can not use that statement at trial.
They can use other admissiable evidence...so, for example, if there is other evidence that shows you committed criminal misconduct the government can use that to prosecute you. But they can not use that statement you gave to the commander.
This will not prevent them from running NJP, if you accept NJP.
I am not sure what you are referring to about 72 hours...there is no rule that requires advisement within 72 hours, nor is there a rule that requries you get 72 hours to consider if to accept NJP. Basically, there is no "72 hour rule" relating to NJP. It souns like some sort of urban legend.
BotXXXXX XXXXXne: The interrogation by the commander was a violation of Art 31. They can not use that statement at court martial. But if they have other evidence that can be used at court, it may be they can convict you at court...so you want to consider that before refusing NJP
Best of luck Marine
Let me know if you have more questions
what would you say are my best choices for appealing the NJP to get my rank back i was charged with articles 86,92,112 i denied being guilty of article 92 it was said that i willfully disobeyd liberty policy set for by my captain which he didnt set any because he was leaving the next day on deployment that left me the senior man in charge i set no liberty policy and as for the article 112 i was charged because my eyes were bloodshot there is no evidence to support my being drunk on duty there wasn't a breatholyzer test done or blood drawn to determine my blood alchohol level to prove the accusation.
NJP appeal is very limited. You can appeal if either
1. THe punishment was too harsh (and this is almost always a looser appeal, since max punishment at NJP is so limited)
2. The proceeding was unfair
I would appeal based on the Art 31 violation. What you describe is a clear violation of Art 31. If the commander used that evidence at the NJP (your statement to him that was no warned) that would be unfair and that would be a basis to apppeal.
If you loose the appeal, you can send another appeal to the BCNR and ask them to review it.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).