" Victim" is a long leaseholder in a building (99 years) who has not paid any service charges for the upkeep of the building yet complainined and sued for Landlord's lack of repairing covenants, Landlord agreed to have works of repair carried out and did so. She them complained they were inadequate and the cost of them was exorbitant and sought huge damages . She lost and was awarded minimal damages. In the UK legal costs " follow the event" ie loser pays them. She has now put in submissions to the court as to why she should not be liable for the Landlord's costs saying amongst other things she has been "a Victim" . Landlord a reasonable chap and been put to enormous legal costs, How do we answer the allegation of "victimisation"?