Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions
You can find the property assessment for that property for 2011-2012 HERE. For 2010-2011, find it HERE. The value is calculated by year, not months.
So for the 2010-2011 assessment, it was calculated to be $561,010.
For 2011-2012, it was $565,234.
The links also show improvement values, as well as other relevant information.
I hope this helps. Good luck.
I hope this helps and clarifies. Please use the SEND or REPLY button to keep chatting, or please RATE when finished. You may always ask follow ups at no charge after rating. Kindly rate my answer as one of TOP THREE FACES/STARS and then SUBMIT, as this is how experts get credit for our time. Rating my answer the bottom two faces/stars (or failing to submit the rating) does not give me credit and reflects poorly on me, even if my answer is correct. I work very hard to formulate an informative and honest answer for you; please reciprocate my good faith with a positive rating.
You are most welcome. It does not list the address, but the parcel which is 320-111-21. This corresponds to the address you provided me - I promise. You can check it yourself HERE. Search under SECURED / SUPPLEMENTAL PROPERTY TAX & RELATED INFORMATION by address.
If you sold it for $150,000, then you may have undersold it. But if you had a large mortgage on it (for example, if the property was upside down), then perhaps this was not a bad decision after all.
Please note: If I tell you simply what you wish to hear, this would be unfair to you. I need to be honest with you and sometimes this means providing information that is not optimal. Negative ratings are reserved for experts who are rude or for erroneous information. Please rate me on the quality of my information; do not punish me for my honesty.
Gentle Reminder: Please, use REPLY or SEND button to keep chatting, or RATE POSITIVELY and SUBMIT your rating when we are finished. You may always ask follow ups at no charge after rating.
I see. Then yes, I am afraid that selling it for $150,000 may have been a miscalculation. I am sorry!