Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions
Thank you for using Just Answer. I look forward to assisting you.I am sorry to hear what happened and your ongoing pain and suffering. While nothing prevents you from filing suit in small claims in California, it's not advisable. If you are suing for medical malpractice, the law says you need to prove that (1) the doctor or other professional breached (broke) the duty of care owed to you and (2) you suffered damages as a direct and proximate cause of the breach. These legal requirements are very hard to prove, and you will need expert witnesses to do it. First, expert witness fees are very expensive. If you have a lawyer representing you on a “contingency” basis (meaning the lawyer only gets paid if you win), which is typically how medical malpractice cases are taken on, so there's no initial costs to you -- the lawyer will usually hire and pay for the expert witness upfront, so you will not have to reimburse the lawyer until the case is over. If you are representing yourself and do not have a lawyer to advance these costs, you may not be able to afford the experts you need to prove your case. Also, getting an expert witness and establishing to the court that he or she is an expert can also be very complicated and should be handled by a trained and experienced lawyer.Ultimately, the decision is yours -you do have the right to file in small claims, but before you decide to do so, I would encourage you to consult with one or two medical malpractice attorneys for a case review (these consultations are also usually free of charge) and then decide how you wish to proceed.
If you do not have any further questions about this matter, please remember to leave me a positive rating (3-5 stars) as that is the only way experts on this site are compensated for our time and expertise, even if you have paid a deposit to the site. Thank you.