Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions
HelloThis is Samuel and I will discuss this and provide you information in this regard.Every party in a civil or criminal jury trial has a right to give a closing argument.
It is a fundamental part of the due process right to be heard. Most states have a statute that reads something like this:
Scope of argument. At the close of the evidence, the respective parties, or their counsel, shall be entitled to sum up the facts to the jury. In their addresses to the jury they shall be allowed ample scope and latitude for argument upon, and illustration of any and all facts involved in the cause, and the evidence tending either to prove or disprove the same. They shall not be forbidden to argue the law of the case to the jury, but shall not assume to instruct the jury upon the law in such a manner as to encroach upon the function of the court to so instruct the jury
See, e.g., Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853 (1975) (criminal defendant has sixth amendment right to give closing argument); Speer v. Barry, 503 A.2d 409, 411 (Pa. Super. 1985) (civil litigant has right to argue)