How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ray Your Own Question
Ray
Ray, Lawyer
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 36939
Experience:  30 years in civil, probate, real estate, elder law
8534270
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Ray is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

My attorney is urging me to go arbitration. The trial got

Customer Question

My attorney is urging me to go arbitration. The trial got postponed 4 times due to several reasons. I am on the right side of law. This is related personal injury law suit. I was rear ended when stopped at the red light by a heavy pick up van. The insurance company only advanced $5000 out 2oK demand that the attorney sent out. I rejected that because it was not sufficient to go or ward with any treatment that I may need in future from the whip lash and herniation resulting from the accident. The healthcare also imposed a lien of 2k on the settlement. All that settled there is not much left from 5K
settlement that Insurance co is offering. Thus I filed a law suit.
I am concerned because I may not get a fair hearing and understanding of my situation of pain and suffering. I am concerned because of any intimidation the defense attorney may use or everyone may impose.
Any suggestion will help. Thanks in advance.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  Ray replied 1 year ago.

Hi and welcome to JA. I am Ray and will be the expert helping you today.

Arbitration is usually heard by former judges or persons with great experience in similar cases.Your lawyer here may be trying to get this to arbitration because he thinks this offers you the quickest and best way to resolve your case.They would hear your testimony about pain and suffering, hopefully there is also some medical here to support your long term effects.I think in some ways you do better with arbitration.It helps you avoid a judge which may or may like not you and your lawyer and your case and avoid politics of such a trial.

It has been my experience that arbitration is pretty fair overall and the recovery is pretty close to what you get in court sometimes more.I do think you can get more than you have been offered.The insurance claim can be negotiated and reduced in most situations.I discount for collecting what the insurance has been paid.This can range from 25%-33%.If your lawyer has not done that insist on this.It will leave you more money however this turns out.

You will want to organize your presentation with exhibits and medical you have that shows pain over time and also future medical requirements and costs.Also if you are pro se you should contact the insurance company directly and negotiate a reduction on the bill.That is common for them to grant this again it can be 25%-33%.Ask for the 33% and see what you get form them.This makes your recovery better and also allows you to use it for future medical.

More here on the advantages/disadvantages..

http://www.all-about-car-accidents.com/arbitration-of-car-accident-claims.html

If you are pro se you would be better off seeking to reduce the insurance payback and at least trying arbitration.

Here is more about how it works.

http://www.injuryclaimcoach.com/arbitration-forum.html

I appreciate the chance to help you today.Please let me know if you have more follow up.Your lawyer who helped you file suit is giving you good advice and the best chance to get the best recovery.Also try to reduce the insurance payback by negotiating with them.