Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
I have a defamation/libel case ongoing in circuit court. I am a pro se litigant and the defendant is also acting pro se. The defamation case was initiated by me against the defendant because of statements he has made about me being a phony and embellisher of my military records (separate federal case against government that is ongoing).
In 2010 the defendant defamed my be sending out an e-mail to several people calling me a phony, embellisher of my military records and he also placed false information about me on an internet site That case went on for over two years and was finally dismissed (still can't understand why). In 2013, he sent another e-mail out to several people stating the same things. In this e-mail however, he began by stating "In 2010 I informed you about this individual (my name) who is a phony, embellisher, etc.".
Question 1: By him including that first sentence in his 2013 e-mail, does that allow me to use the evidence I produced against him in the initial defamation case in the current case?
Question 2: Is information obtained via GOOGLE considered "credible" evidence in court?
Question 3: This individual (defendant) is basing his remarks about me on the "font" used in citations presented to me by the Navy Department (Marine Veteran). He is claiming that the font in the citations was not invented until 1994 and I was given the citations in 1969. His argument may be relevant in the federal case regarding my records but is is relevant in the current defamation case. I am supposing it goes to "falsity".
Regarding question #1, I may have misunderstood. The new email in 2013 is enough for me to have opened my new case of defamation. That I did. However, I want to bring into evidence in the new case, evidence from the prior case that was dismissed. My question is, for my purposes, does the defendant's first statement in his latest e-mail, open the door for me to include evidence from the former case into the new case? We had a hearing yesterday and the judge postponed it and it was part of my answer to hm when he asked me why I waited so long to file a complaint. Obviously he had not read the case yet but was insinuating that the statute of limitations had passed. When I explained the details, including the previous case, I told him I was under the impression that the evidence from the former case could be used in this new case. His response was "not necessarily". That is not my take on how the rules of civil procedure are written. I believe that by the defendant mentioning the first e-mail in his second and latest e-mail, he opened the door for me to bring in the evidence I had against him in the initial case which is a lot more than I have for the new case other than the 2013 e-mail (including his sending a latter to my hometown newspaper with my photo included stating I was a phony and embellisher of my military records and several e-mails to websites accusing me of being a phony and actually bragging about sending the letter to the newspaper.
Excellent! So the way I understand it, the evidence from the prior case, in that it is relative to the newer case would not be considered "hearsay" but is admissible evidence? Can you provide me the TN "Code" or at least let me know what I need to look for when going through the TN Codes. I get the impression from the judge, unless I furnish a TN Code showing the information is relevant and not hearsay, he will rule against it so a code to refer to would be helpful. If you don't know it or can't come up with it, can you at least tell me what portion of the TN codes I would look under?
Further what you are saying is that the defendants GOOGLE information that the font used in my citations was not invented until 1994 would be considered credible?
And finally, I cannot object to the relevance of the font evidence from Google in my defamation case because it goes to me proving the falsity of his accusations. Please note howeveer that I do have other evidence the will show that his accusations are false but I am concerned that if I object to the relevance of the GOOGLE information in the defamation case, since it is actually relevant to the federal case, the judge may look upon that as I am trying to avoid the issue of the font, even though I have other evidence of the falsity of the defendant's statements. Just trying to clarify and I will not hold you up any longer.
Thank you Ely for your candor and advise. I am a recent law school graduate, except it was an on line program. It was a full program and took me four years to compelte but I never intended to take the Bar exam. I spent over 30 years in law enforcement and have always been interested in the law. I am retied and began the progam at the age of 62 and completed it at 67, however I have no litigation experience. I try to do my best pro se but I have learned that judges do not care too much for pro se litigants as they believe they clog up the system. I cannot afford an attorney, that is if one can be found. I am amazed at the responses I get when I do attempt to find an attorney. I am told, "I don't handle defamation cases". Same in the federal case I have ongoing. when I think it is finally time to enlist an attorney to fight all the technicalities the defense brings up, when I speak to an attorney about handling a "federal" case, they look at me like I just came from outer space. Finally, the fact that every single state and every jurisdiction in each state has its own set of rules outside the FRCP is just perplexing to me. As I move from one county to the next because of venue issues, the new judge tells me I did not follow the proper procedure. My experience in law enforcement and investigations and dealing with the courts over thirty years and then studying law and then attempting to litigate pro se, tells me that the American Jurisprudence system is in dire need for overhauling. Thanks again and I know you must be the last to respond so when I receive your final response, I will include a tip. Your advice has been very helpful and I will definately give you an excellent rating. Frank
no more questions at this time. thank you
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).