Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
Thank you for using JustAnswer. I am researching your issue and will respond shortly.
-What are the procedures that the insurance company usually carries on? - The insurance company will typically have an "adjuster" come out and look at the damage. They will typically see what caused the damage (most likely cause) as well as the costs to repair, etc... They may see if you were the one that caused it, if you have insurance, etc...
-Is my apartment in Spain in danger? Most likely not. Even if the insurance company finds you at fault, they would have to sue you, get a judgment against you, and then try to enforce that judgment internationally..
International judgment collection is very difficult to do successfully...
Just one thing about the first question...
...and only if the judgment justifies it AND you have the assets to pay off such a judgment would they pursue it..
After they evaluate the damages, what makes them decide if they sue the tenant or not?
The house itself is in very bad shape (old wood all over), in case I would get any liability, would it be shared with the landlord? - That really depends upon the terms of the insurance policy, and if they do determine negligence on your part, they have what's known as "subrogation" rights, in that they can opt to go after you for repayment.
Let me finish the original questions first please...
-How will decide if is a negligence by me, the fire brigade or the insurance company? - Both can make this determination, but typically it's the insurance company that would make this determination and try to get you to pay, and if it doesn't, it's really the courts that would make this determination IF the insurance company thinks that it would be economically viable to take you to court.
Now like I said before, it might determine that it's not worth it to sue you if you don't have many (if any) assets in the states.
Again, international collection of judgments is VERY expensive, and the costs in a smaller case (<$10,000 or so) would likely exceed what could ever be recovered.
Now per your follow up question: After they evaluate the damages, what makes them decide if they sue the tenant or not? - The amount that they pay out per the policy is what they consider, as well as their likelihood of recovery should they sue. That is, if they have to pay out $50,000 to the landlord, that's their "damages" as a result of the negligence. They would have to pay an attorney at least $5,000 to bring such a case, and they would look at your assets in the states as well as any income in the states (to garnish). If you're only here a year, and all of your assets are outside of the states, assuming that this is not going to be a 6 figure plus award, they probably wouldn't sue, because the costs would exceed the likely recovery (again, they take into account how difficult and expensive it would be to recover that judgment from you).
Hope that clears things up a bit. If you have any other questions, please let me know. If not, and you have not yet, please rate this answer either a 3, 4, or 5 (good or better). Please note that I do not get any credit for this answer unless and until you rate it that way. Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX good luck to you!
Can I ask you another question?
If it's in the same scope as the original, yes.
Please consider how "above and beyond" I go in answering your questions when rating and deciding upon granting bonuses, if any...
yes, it is, a couple of days ago the fire brigade called me asking me if I ever saw a cigarette by the window, I told them not and I told them that I have no idea how the fire started, can that have any legal consequences? and in general terms, with whoever I speak to regarding, should that be my answer? Like, I have no idea how this started?
You can certainly say that. You're not saying for certain that you never smoke (which you know would be a lie) but if you say that you "don't know" how it started or "don't recall" a cigarette by the window, they can't hold your memory against you... that is, they can't say that this is a "lie" because they don't know what you remember and when you remember it.
So I'd be surprised if you had any legal issues resulting from saying that you don't recall or don't remember...
So would you recomend me to do any move at all?
At this point, not really. It all depends on what the insurance company wants to do, but comply with the investigation, etc... and understand that for them to sue it would be likely more expensive than it would be worth.
of course, You are being so helpful
Ok, Thank you very much
You're welcome, and again, good luck to you!
I'll click on excelent, tell me, starting a new question can I caontact you again?
Yes, if I am still in the office. You can request me by sending it "To ScottyMacEsq"
thank you again
You're welcome, and again, good luck to you!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).