How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Dimitry K., Esq. Your Own Question
Dimitry K., Esq.
Dimitry K., Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 41220
Experience:  Multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation and administration.
18572087
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Dimitry K., Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I dont think i understand your answer. "Frankly I see the

This answer was rated:

I don't think i understand your answer. "Frankly I see the judge possibly making an error against the ex based on his determination unless there is more to the facts, or if the ex appeared to be overly belligerent or neglectful otherwise." I don't know what you mean by this. the judge would rule against the ex? what do i file to prevent this? how do i do this?
my ex did join the boy scouts to spend more time with my son and see him more.

Thank you for your follow-up and thank you very much for requesting me to explain further. Please allow me to do so below.

 

Here is what I meant. Based on my most educated guesswork, I assume that the language of the clause you listed about shared activity was meant to be more limited to actual aster-school or relatively short events, and not to overnight trips. The judge, if it is the same judge, has not clarified the language which would mean that at least as far it currently stands, the ex is reading the condition properly. Under the current interpretation, his request to see the kids on sanctioned overnight trips is valid because it is an after-school and shared activity, it was just likely not what he judge had in mind. Purely textually the ex is right, but likely based on policy the judge was (or still is) seeking to limit the scope. That would mean that you may want to file a motion for clarification pertaining to that clause and ask it to be more limited in nature. Otherwise the judge has a stronger case to agree with your ex and actually find you in contempt by not allowing him to spend time with your son.

 

Hope that clarifies!

Dimitry K., Esq. and 3 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you

Related Legal Questions