How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Delta-Lawyer Your Own Question

Delta-Lawyer, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 3151
Experience:  10 years practicing IP law and general litigation
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Delta-Lawyer is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Lease Agreement Purchase

Resolved Question:

I entered a Lease Purchase Agreement with my partner for equipment we were to use in our business in March, 2013 with the owner of the equipment. The equipment was used and we were essentially replacing the prior owner's agreement. Our terms were 23 months of payments. After 6 months, my partner and I dissolved our business relationship and my partner approached the lease purchase company to remove myself from the lease purchase agreement and she also returned one of the pieces of equipment. At that point, the owner of the equipment entered into a new agreement for purchase of the one piece of equipment, with an extended term to 13 additional months, but a lower monthly payment. Essentially, the owner took back the one piece of equipment, applied no credit from payments we made during the 6 months, extended the lease - causing my former partner to still pay for the two pieces of equipment but owning only one. At the time my former partner signed the new agreement for the equipment, the owner instructed her to not share with me that there was a new agreement in place.  

In the agreement I signed it states all parties must be notified and in agreement if changes are made. I was told about the new agreement from my former partner. The agreement also states it replaces any older or prior agreements. I attempted to remove myself as a named insured on the equipment, as per the agreement I had, I no longer own the equipment and there is now a new agreement in place. The owner of the equipment is stating I cannot remove myself from the insurance (he also sold the insurance) and that my agreement is binding until my former partner pays for the equipment in full. What if anything am I responsible for?

Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  Delta-Lawyer replied 2 years ago.

I hope this message finds you well, present circumstances excluded. This is an interesting case for a number of reasons. The most obvious issue that comes to mind is that you essentially have two different contracts at the outset (contract for the equipment and an insurance contract for the equipment). You have been removed from the equipment contract and no one can refute that simply fact.


As I understand it, even though you no longer have an equity interest in the equipment whatsoever, they are attempting to still enforce your original liability on the insurance.


Since you have no equity interests in the equipment, it is counter intuitive for the opposing party to claim you cannot cancel your insurance agreement over said equipment. Moreover, they should not be able to use your signature on the insurance agreement as a binding act of law relative to the equipment.


If there is a penalty provision in the insurance agreement for early withdrawal, you may be contractually bound to pay that penalty, in whole or in part (may be able to prorate). However, you are not legally bound to stay in the contract and insurance property to which you have no legal obligation. As such, your partner in assuming payments for the equipment must necessarily assume the insurance coverage as well.


In short, barring a penalty provision in the insurance contract to which you may owe a fine for early withdrawal, you have no legal responsibility in this situation based on the information that you have shared with me.


Let me know if you have any additional questions or comments.


Best wishes moving forward!

Customer: replied 2 years ago.

The insurance piece of the situation is minimal, as it clearly states in my policy I cannot receive a refund for the insurance. I do,however, want my name removed from the policy.


The concern I have, is the fact the Owner is stating if the new agreement placed between himself and my former partner goes into default, the agreement we had prior is binding. Which is incorrect with all the changes made, equipment switched, etc.

The agreement states all changes need to be signed by all parties. This never took place and it shouldn't have as they moved on to the current and binding agreement together.



Expert:  Delta-Lawyer replied 2 years ago.
It is not legally binding as that would be clearly inequitable. In an abundance of caution, it may be worth it to first send a certified letter with a return receipt (as legal notice) to remove you name from the insurance documentation. Tell them to respond in writing to your formal request within 5 business days from the date of the letter. If they do not respond in affirmative fashion, or timely fashion, you may need to file a motion or petition before a court in the county in which the insurance agreement was signed, ordering the contract have your name removed per your lawful requests. There would quite literally be a defense for your opponent.
Delta-Lawyer, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 3151
Experience: 10 years practicing IP law and general litigation
Delta-Lawyer and 4 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it. Lee Michigan

Meet The Experts:

  • Tina



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
< Last | Next >
  • Tina's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
  • Ely's Avatar


    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • JPEsq's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor
  • Law Educator, Esq.'s Avatar

    Law Educator, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
  • FiveStarLaw's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    25 years of experience helping people like you.
  • Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.'s Avatar

    Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.
  • Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation and administration.