Dr. Hahn, I hope this message finds you well and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this matter with you. It is my legal opinion that this was a 14th amendment violation based on the specific language that you cite.
As you are aware, the 14th amendment can be legally trumped or set aside in certain matters (as stated above) when there is a compelling state interest. So, what is a compelling state interest? In Howe v. Brown, 319 F. Supp. 862 (N.D. Ohio 1970), it was held that, the compelling-state-interest-test is mostly applied in all voting rights cases and equal protection cases. It is also applied when a disputed law requires strict scrutiny. While the Courts have never set forth a bright line on how to determine if an interest is compelling, the concept generally refers to something necessary or crucial, as opposed to something merely preferred. National security, public safety and the lives of more than one person are generally considered to be compelling state interest issues.
In my professional legal opinion as well as my personal opinion, the actions of Sibelius infringed on this girl's 14th amendment rights without question. I fail to see any arguments to the contrary as a matter of fact that have any real significance.
In medico-legal circles, there are a number of other constitutional issues that are being presented by the ACA.
The first and most obvious relates to Judge Roberts determination that the ACA is a tax and therefore constitutional. As you know, a tax must originate in the House. While the ACA bill by number did originate in the House, the entire substance and effect of the bill is from the Senate. As such, if the ACA is to be construed as a tax (the individual mandate more precisely) then is should have emanated from the House in substance. That was not the case. I understand that there is at least one law suit that is making its way through the federal court system that is attempting to make this point. In fact, there is a school of thought that this has been Roberts' intent all along.
On that same topic, forcing an individual to purchase health insurance could arguably violate or infringe the Commerce Clause, the Takings Clause, the Presentment Clause (9th Amendment and 10th Amendment).
The federal government (HHS) having the ability to access your bank account through the ACA arguably violates the 4th and 5th amendments and infringes upon your right to be secure in your person, papers, and effects, as do unreasonable searches into personal health insurance records.
Excessive fines, in the form of the ACA penalty, violate the Constitutional promise contained in the words "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." (8th Amendment) The violation stems not only from the penalty, but also from mandating private citizens purchase health insurance.
The contraception mandates could arguably violate the 1st Amendment freedom of religion.
In summary, and as to your immediate question, the answer is yes, in my opinion, this was a violation of this little girl's 14th amendment rights. I anticipate these violations to continue undeterred unless or until there is Supreme Court jurisprudence in place to curtail such infringements. As you can see above, and as you likely knew already, there are numerous other questionable infringing components of the ACA.
The scary thing is that the regulations and regulatory authority granted under the ACA will actually spawn more Constitutional infringements in all likelihood without the strict attention that would otherwise be present in congress.
I suspect that what was attempted relative to this girl will become even more present (and was a test run either consciously or subconsciously) for life and death decisions that will inevitably be necessary for end of life treatment for patients on under government care as the baby-boomers continue to age. We have seen it in other nations and we will see it here too. I recently read that Americans normally generate more medical billing in their last year of life than all other years combined. This will have to be addressed as more people inevitably end up on the government ticket and one could surmise that Sibelius may take similar measures on them as well.
Let me know if you have any additional questions or comments. It is certainly an interesting topic for discussion.
Best wishes going forward!