How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask CalAttorney2 Your Own Question
CalAttorney2
CalAttorney2, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 10244
Experience:  Civil litigation attorney for individuals and businesses.
71563194
Type Your Legal Question Here...
CalAttorney2 is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

A judge denied me evidence that was introduced into court by

This answer was rated:

A judge denied me evidence that was introduced into court by the opposing party. The transcripts indicate that I did ask him for all information presented. This did not happen. I am looking for the statute or rule of law that states a judge must show all parties any evidence that is presented in court. This happened in a town court located in the state of new york. Thank you.

William B. Esq. :

Dear Customer, thank you for using our service. My name is XXXXX XXXXX I would like to assist you today.

William B. Esq. :

What you are referring to is an "ex parte" communication, where one party speaks to a judge, or provides information or documents to the judge outside the knowledge, or hearing of the other party.

William B. Esq. :

Here is an excerpt from a Judicial Primer from the NY State Court of Appeals with statutory and case law references that may be of assistance:

William B. Esq. :

Ex parte communications
Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7-110(b) (22 NYCRR 1200.41) states:
In an adversary proceeding, a lawyer shall not communicate, or
cause another to communicate, as to the merits of the cause with a judge
or an official before whom the proceeding is pending, except:
7 1. in the course of official proceedings in the cause;
2. in writing if the lawyer promptly delivers a copy of the
writing to opposing counsel or to an adverse party who is not
represented by a lawyer;
3. orally upon adequate notice to opposing counsel or to an
adverse party who is not represented by a lawyer; or
4. as otherwise authorized by law, or by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
The Rules of Judicial Conduct governing judges prohibit ex parte
communications except, inter alia, those made "for scheduling or administrative purposes
. . . that do not affect a substantial right of any party" (22 NYCRR 100.3[6][a]) Those
rules also permit a judge to confer separately with the parties, with their consent (see 22
NYCRR 100.3[6][d]).
Sending ex parte letters to a judge explaining a client's default and inquiring about
procedure to reopen a matter warrants discipline (see Matter of Abbot, 167 AD2d 617 [3rd
Dept 1990]).
A new trial was ordered where a trial judge improperly considered an ex parte
conversation with the plaintiff’s attorney prior to issuing a supplemental order which
resolved substantive issues in the prior trial (see Antoci v Antoci, 113 AD2d 857 [2nd Dept
1985]).

Customer:

The evidence was presented in Small Claims court. I was there, but the evidence was given directly to the judge. He looked at it and returned it directly to the opposing party. I did not get a chance to review. This was very important because the opposing party said it was a certified letter that she sent to my family attorney. He never got it. I told this to the judge. The judge was quick to provide my evidence to the opposing party, but I was never given the opportunity to view the letter.

Customer:

The evidence was presented in Small Claims court. I was there, but the evidence was given directly to the judge. He looked at it and returned it directly to the opposing party. I did not get a chance to review. This was very important because the opposing party said it was a certified letter that she sent to my family attorney. He never got it. I told this to the judge. The judge was quick to provide my evidence to the opposing party, but I was never given the opportunity to view the letter.


William B. Esq. :

The fact that the evidence was given strictly to the judge and not to you makes this an "ex parte communication"

William B. Esq. :

(you can be in the room, and still made unaware of the communication made to the court - the other party has an obligation to give you the document, both the other party and the judge are in violation of this rule).

William B. Esq. :

Here is a link to the rules of judicial conduct: http://www.nycourts.gov/rules/chiefadmin/100.shtml

William B. Esq. :

Here is a link to an article regarding the rules of professional conduct (attorney): http://assets.wne.edu/162/25_note_Legal_Et.pdf

William B. Esq. :

And this is the link to the full article that I cited earlier (look for pg. 8 in the article - pg. 11 in the PDF): http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/forms/Law%20Guardian%20handbook/OrientationtotheProfessionProgramMaterials.pdf

Customer:

Thank you sir. That is what I needed to know.

William B. Esq. :

You are welcome, I do wish you the best. Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have further questions.

CalAttorney2 and 6 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you

Related Legal Questions