Hi and welcome to JA. My name is XXXXX XXXXX X am the expert that will be assisting you today.
Yes you absolutely would include these in your answer.The Minnesota rules require this.
8.03 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively (1) accord and satisfaction, (2) arbitration and award, (3) assumption of risk, (4) contributory negligence, (5) discharge in bankruptcy, (6) duress, (7) estoppel, (8) failure of consideration, (9) fraud, (10) illegality, (11) injury by fellow servant, (12) laches, (13) license, (14) payment, (15) release, (16) res judicata, (17) statute of frauds, (18) statute of limitations, (19) waiver, and (20) any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense. When a party has mistakenly designated a defense as a counterclaim or a counterclaim as a defense, the court, on such terms as justice may require, shall treat the pleading as if there had been a proper designation.
Here is a sample answer form for you and you would include affirmative defenses in your answer. You would modify this to your situation and facts.
I appreciate the chance to assist you today.Please let me know if you have more follow up.Thanks again.
More for you here, skip down to answer..
It is to your advantage to plead any affirmative defenses as it may result in all or part of their suit failing.
"Failure of consideration" could mean that the defendant did not agree to the contract, for example, correct?
Yes you are claiming that there was no contract to breach because on of the elements here was missing. There was failure of consideration or no consideration.
Some more possibilities for you for defenses.
Here it flows that a failure of consideration means they cannot prove up the contract and then there can be no breach under the law.
Thanks for letting me help you today.I wish you the best.
Thanks, Ray. That was a great help. Have a good day.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).