Hello friend. My name is XXXXX XXXXX welcome to JustAnswer. Please note: (1) this is general information only, not legal advice, and, (2) there may be a slight
delay between your follow ups and my replies.POST REGULATIONS
There are no specific regulations for posting signs under Florida Statutes. One is free to post signs that WARN individuals that the property is private, but this is not mandatory and is up to the land-owning entity.LIABILITY
For trespassers, there is no liability. Liability to a landowner comes in three types:
INVITEE: a person generally invited to land for business purposes. The owner or occupant owes an invitee the duty of keeping the premises in a reasonably safe condition, and, as plaintiff contends, also to guard against subjecting such person to dangers of which the owner or occupant is cognizant or might reasonably have foreseen. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Wylie, Fla. 1950, 46 So.2d 396 and Messner v. Webb's City, Inc., Fla. 1952, 62 So.2d 66.
LICENSEE: a person on the land via invitation or permission. The duty owed a licensee is to refrain from wanton negligence or wilful misconduct
which would injure him, or to refrain from intentionally exposing him to danger. City of Boca Raton v. Mattef, Fla. 1956, 91 So.2d 644.
TRESPASSER: a person on the land without permission. "The unwavering rule as to a trespasser is that the property owner is under the duty only to avoid willful and wanton harm to him
and upon discovery of his presence to warn him of known dangers not open to ordinary observation." Wood v. Camp, 284 So. 2d 691 - Fla: Supreme Court 1973
quoting Byers v. Gunn, 81 So.2d 723 (Fla. 1955); McNulty v. Hurley, 97 So.2d 185, 187 (Fla. 1957).
In essence, one has very little duty to safeguard trespassers and no special duty to prevent them from hurting themselves on your property. A good way to explain it is: "Robber jumps over fence and unto a nail. Owner of land is not liable for the robber's injury upon discovering robber. However, owner cannot then take a pipe and hit the robber with it (unless the robber is violent)."ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE
There is a caveat
. One has to take special precaution for children even if they enter without permission. This is called attractive nuisance. The attractive nuisance doctrine states that a landowner may be held liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if the injury is caused by a hazardous object or condition on the land that is likely to attract children who are unable to appreciate the risk posed by the object or condition.
The owner is expected to take reasonable
precautions if the land has any hazardous items that may attract children to play who may injure themselves. These precautions include fences, primary, but it is on a case by case basis and the underlining rule is REASONABLE.
I hope this helps and clarifies. Good luck.
Gentle Reminder: Please use the REPLY
button to keep chatting, or RATE
my answer when we are finished. Kindly rate my answer as one of the top three faces
and then submit
, as this is how I get credit for my time with you. Rating my answer the bottom two faces does not give me credit and reflects poorly on me, even if my answer is correct.
I work very hard to formulate an informative and honest answer for you; please reciprocate my good faith. (You may always ask follow ups at no charge after rating