yes please help, even if you think there is a slim chance, I would like to know the best way to move forward. Thanks you
Tim,Thank you for your follow-up. Not a problem, I just wanted to give you that option since I did not really give you positive news in the past, and unfortunately based on your current post my fears were realized as predicted. Please allow me to go down the list with your full post.You posted:Car Insurance Claim Denied: I rented out my car and it got stolen. They say that when I signed up for insurance, if they had known it was going to be rented they wouldn't have covered it. They knew that the vehicle was for business and registered in the company name. When getting the insurance, they asked several questions such as, are you hauling anything and other questions that I honestly answered that had nothing to do with renting out the vehicle. There is nothing in their contract that states that it can't be rented. My apologies but that is somewhat irrelevant. If you signed up for personal insurance when you were expecting to use the vehicle for a commercial purpose, that had to be disclosed to the insurer.The reason they say they denied the claim is for misrepresentation by not informing them that it was going to be rented.They are legally correct. There are two major types of insurance policies, personal and commercial. Renting a vehicle and using it for profit turns it into a commercial policy that had to have been disclosed.1) Do I have any chance of successfully perusing this in some way?I apologize but on the language you have no chance of prevailing. The insurance policy is right, the only recourse is against the thief for value of your vehicle.2) How would I go about doing it and is there a special type of attorney?You can try to find a contract law attorney and have him review the language, then potentially sue for breach of contract. But your chances of winning, are very very very slim. Sorry but I have to be realistic.3) They strung me along for 6 weeks deciding if it will be covered or not and made it seam hopeful. I don't see why they needed to do this when it should be an easy answer from the start if the reason was that it was rented. I told them this from the beginning of the claim.It is not always an easy answer They needed to evaluate your policy and figure out if that would constitute substantial use. I am positive they spoke with their own legal department before giving you an answer. But the answer they gave you is unfortunately the same one I expected in the past.Hope that helps.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).