How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask David C. Garner Your Own Question
David C. Garner
David C. Garner, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 970
Experience:  JD with Distinction, Admitted to practice in California
19551178
Type Your Legal Question Here...
David C. Garner is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Yes Hi....Back on July 12, 2013, my wife and I rented a vehicle

This answer was rated:

Yes Hi....Back on July 12, 2013, my wife and I rented a vehicle from a 'major' car rental company for four days, during a trip to Los Angeles. We just recently, (August 31, 2013) received notification from the rental company, that the vehicle had been, not only damaged, but that the 'spare tire' was missing.

When we received the vehicle, (we rented it from the JW Marriott Hotel in LA, and returned it to LAX airport on July 16, 2013 about 8pm PDT,) there was ABSOLUTELY NO visible damage as we perused the car before signing off on it. The damage the car company has accused us of incurring is in the amount of $703.77. They have also forwarded, via photographs of said damage to us. At the time we received the vehicle we did not however, check to see if the spare tire was in tact (?) but assumed it was! There also forwarded us a photo of 'an odometer' that showed a mileage of 25155....we returned our vehicle with with the odometer reading of 25154.

I am in possession of the 'paperwork' that we were afforded at the time of the rental, and there is no mention and/or notification of ANY existing damage to the vehicle.

So my question to you is this....What would you suggest our recourse and/or response should be to the car rental company, in lieu of the fact that we MOST DEFINITELY DID NOT cause this damage to the vehicle in question, and we CERTAINLY did not pack a spare tire into our suitcase for the trip back to Tampa, FL.

I would be MOST APPRECIATIVE of ANY advice you could afford me. THANK YOU so very much. 'BE'

David C. Garner :

Hello, are you there?

David C. Garner :

Hello.....

David C. Garner :

Hello......

David C. Garner :

Hello.....

David C. Garner and 3 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you

Hello,

 

I will be happy to help you, but I have a question. When you turned the car in, was it to a person? Was there someone who handed you receipt (an attendant)?

 

Please let me know.

 

DCG

Customer: replied 3 years ago.

Yes, of course, we returned it to the car rental company Rental Car Return @ LAX. An agent ran the bar code and printed out or receipt, handed it to us and we entered the terminal.

Ok....

 

I would tell them to go jump and in no uncertain terms. If they wanted to identify damage they should have done it at the time you returned the vehicle. Since there was clearly more mileage on it later, I don't think they could sustain their burden of proof at trial. Also, since it is only $700 or so, they are NOT going to sue. Not to mention the fact that $700 (which includes a new spare tire) amounts to having it waxed, there certainly was nothing significant wrong with the car, even in their mind.

 

I would send them a letter disclaiming the damage and noting that their opportunity to discover this was when you turned it in, not later. That is the purpose of a walk-around. I would then ignore them. I think the mileage discrepancy alone destroys their case.

 

I hope this helps.

 

DCG

Customer: replied 3 years ago.

If you looked closely @ my initial descriptive of the incident, you'll see that the mileage discrepancy is ONLY '1' mile. We turned the car in with an odometer reading of 25154, and the photo they sent us of 'an' odometer (how do I know it's even from the vehicle in question) read 25155.

Hello,

 

That to me is not the issue. More so that is a lot of mileage (1 mile) to accumulate moving it around the lot. That strongly suggests something else happened and they are trying to stick you with it. That 1 mile is very significant.

 

DCG