Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.To answer directly, the number '50' does not refer to full-time employees, but to the amount of employees on your employment rolls. Everyone would count as 'one' employee for the purpose of calculation, so even if someone works for 1 hour a month, they would still be an employee for that time. You may want to at least consider turning some into 1099 contractors as those would not count against the rolls and would lower the size of your entity in terms of federal designations.Hope that helps.
That is great advice, had some1099 contractors. We did with some that we felt fit that. Wouldn't you know, even though they signed agreements and picked their own hours and were not directly supervised, they received unemployment benefits when we decreased hours. now we are faced with the other 1099 contractor to turn them into employees as well.
Thank you for your follow-up, Stacy.Ah, I see. So the state claimed that they were mischaracterized employees. That does hurt that option but perhaps you can review your 'scope of control' and other federal guidelines to greater ease the split between employment and supervision, and pursue that further as an option. In any case while for discrimination purposes there is an hourly limitation on how many employees you may have in a full-time or a part-time basis, in terms of sheer size, each employee counts separately. If you want to ensure that you remain under 50, consolidate hours with individuals or bring them on board as contractors whenever feasible.Good luck.
Thank you and I am appealing that decision with unemployment as they work on their own.
In response to your comment of consolidating hours, what does that mean? If I have 2 part time employees in same job and both work 20 hours, that equals 40 and what does that mean in relation to Federal Laws?
Stacy,You are most welcome. In a situation where you consolidate individuals into one position and go above 30 hours a week, then that person would be entitled to benefits as per the "Affordable Care Act" (or "Obamacare" depending on perspective). That would potentially increase your botXXXXX XXXXXne and would fine you if benefits are not provided. Therefore unless you wish to provide benefits, keeping your employees under 30 hours a week would be ideal. By consolidating I do not mean hours, I mean positions--you would need to terminate or release one individual, and increase the hours of the other individual in question.Good luck.
Educator, Esq: Follow up question: Is the following
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).