Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.This would most fully fall under contract law. The first thing to keep in mind is that most of contract law is 'common law', that is, unwritten law. For commercial transactions the UCC governs, specifically Article 2. You can find the code at the link below:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uccWhat else governs potentially is product liability against the other parties if the items received were defective. Most likely state courts would govern unless the cause of action is extremely large ($90,000 or more in damages), and the parties have 'complete diversity' from one another, meaning that they are located in separate states. Typically state courts are more favorable in this instance.Good luck.
That didn't really answer my questions. What part of article 2 would this fall? How would I apply the law to resolve this issue, and because this lawsuit is potentially over 20 million, which courts would I apply to?
A manufacturer of computers acquires it's microchips from a corporation. Several of these computers have exploded; the corporation fixes the problems, which were their fault, but the manufacturer has had substantial loses from this...estimated to be around 20 million. I want to know what the applicable principles of the law are, including key facts, and how I would apply those laws, as well as which courts would handle this case...Federal or state?
Susan,Let me work backward here. Either federal or state courts could hear the case. Both courts have 'concurrent' jurisdiction over this matter. State courts are more likely to hear it if there was a choice of law clause in the contractual terms between the parties, and if they choose to pursue this in state courts since those courts are not as complicated with rules, and tend to be more plaintiff friendly (higher potential awards).The applicable principles of law here are based on the terms of the contract itself (which is not statutory), and also is based on breach of terms of the agreement, something that section 2-207 defines below:http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-607The key facts are based on who assumed the risk, which is again contractual, for whatever loss was obtained. That has to be reviewed from the agreement since that would spell out who is responsible for losses and who is not. For example if the corp did not claim liability for additional losses, then the other entity has to sue for foreseeable damages that were cause by the breach. But this is still a general response since without knowing your specific contract, and all of the underlying facts, I cannot in good conscience give you a proper theory of the case.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).