Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.Inmates and free citizens have exactly the same rights when it comes to their personal property or real property. Neither is afforded special privileges nor are those privileges taken away. For example an inmate, if he can afford it, can hire someone to manage his properties, as can a free citizen who is not incarcerated. An inmate can always sign a 'quit claim' deed and transfer the interest he owns in the property to someone else. But just like anyone who has any sort of an outside interest or a mortgage, he cannot transfer actual ownership until he pays off the mortgage and removes that lien. The whole point of a mortgage is to deny the owner of the property the right to transfer ownership to someone else without first paying off the debt. In this case the inmate has to either pay off the debt if he can, contact the lender to refinance, or contact them to release the interest, which would then permit him to likewise get rid of the debt. Anything beyond that keeps the property under his name and something he would not be able to transfer to an another.Hope that helps.
Thank you for your answer.Can the state of Nevada do anything with the inmates house to get the oweing child support? or maybe a Judge could or even the child support office? I was told that the state could put a lien on the house and when the mortgage is paid up they would get their money for the child support, it would be a long time until the mortgage will be paid up. Is there any other way that the State or a Judge could get the owed money from the house?
When this case first started the other parent signed a form to say they did not want any child support from the now inmate. The inmate could not have paid it anyway as there was no money available to pay for it. But I don't know if the "free" parent has changed their mind as I think the form was for one year.
Thank you for your follow-up.Such a form would be unenforceable anyways as the right to collect support cannot be waived--that money is for the child, it is not owed to the other parent (although the result is often somewhat different).Typically the state would not pursue the property unless the other parent pursues motions and places a lien against the property. The state would rarely pursue this on their own as they are technically representing the parent and not their own interests. But what you have been told is correct, they can place a lien and then seek a means to execute the lien and go after the equity on the property.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).