Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.The dealership is correct, an "OR" title grants exactly the same right to either of the parties listed on title. Either party can choose to surrender the vehicle without the other party claiming that their property rights were somehow violated. The officer is not correct, on title it does not matter who is listed as primary and who is listed as secondary, the rights of both owners are exactly the same. Yes, the owner could sue (in civil court as this is not a criminal matter), but a police officer is not an attorney, he cannot give you legal advice. Plus, being sued does not mean that he will actually prevail, it simply gives him such an option. Good luck.
What is the likelihood he would prevail in such a suit provided I have the proof that he paid nothing and said he would pay everything; and what are possible damages he could win?
Wayne,Thank you for your follow-up. The fact that you paid for everything happens to be irrelevant since both parties have the exact same right and obligation to make payments or maintain the vehicle. You can use that to show that you were more responsible for the vehicle, but it does not, in the eyes of the courts, grant you some larger or stronger right over the vehicle. The likelihood that he will prevail is very small unless he can show that this vehicle was solely utilized and set out for his personal use, and you yourself never utilized it yourself. Then that may create an obligation of sort and strengthen his claim. What he could sue for is half of the value of the vehicle and any and all direct and foreseeable costs and damages from the loss of the car. For example if he had to get a rental car or use public transport, those costs would be direct and foreseeably stemming from the loss of vehicle. But again, this is highly unlikely.Good luck.
unless he can show that this vehicle was solely utilized andset out for his personal use, and you yourself never utilized it yourself. Then that may create an obligation of sort and strengthen his claim. -- It actually was for his use and i have driven it only once. I only co-signed because he didnt qualify on his own. What would he need to prove that and would he have to prove it? Would this be done in small claims or is there another court without the max like civil court?
Wayne,He would need to bring receipts that he was the sole user (such as gas and maintenance receipts). This can be pursued by him in small claims or in a higher court if he would be seeking attorney fees, for example.Good luck.
he wont have receipts and maintenance would likely be paid by me since he has no money. He is a schemer and probably has the text message thread from me that says the car is his responsibility (even though i've paid everything which you already addressed)
I'm presuming that text thread would be the evidence needed?
Wayne,Texts are admissible also, but simply stating that something his 'responsibility' but there is no evidence that it took place is not enough, courts would need to see direct examples of use and maintenance.Good luck.
Not exactly what I wanted to hear but Thank you for the info. After I rate your information, will I get the opportunity to have this thread emailed to me?
Wayne,You are most welcome. I am sorry that the information is not quite as you hoped but I also hope that the information will prove useful. Once you rate, the thread should be emailed to you. If you have issues or problems, please follow up with me and I will ask the moderators to further assist you.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).