approx. three weeks ago. There was no value placed on the quit claim. the home was tax assessed at 175, 000 . My son was advanced 700 for bail and 7800 for attorney fees. the quit claim was processed by an attorney and recorded.
Thank you for your follow-up, Frank.Typically a quit-claim transaction between family members does not raise eye-brows. But if your son is in the midst of litigation and the other party prevails, they can go to court and attempt to reverse the transaction based on fraud. This is why I asked you as to what the value for the quit-claim ultimately was--if there was value associated with the transfer that is close to the market value of the property, it is harder to reverse since there is less of an argument that the property was removed as a means to defraud (the other party received compensation so it was not an empty transfer). In this case, if the other party did not yet file a civil claim, you are likely fine because to claim 'fraud', the other party must show that there was a civil claim in place and that is what is being avoided. There is no civil claim yet, the charges are criminal, so it is a harder argument to make for the opposing party should they ever choose to file suit.Good luck.
I can call the atty and ask if a value was placed on the quit claim and get back to you. My son has not as yet been charged with a felony related to the accounts he managed. However, his accounts are being audited by the company and insurance claims may result. At this point his charges are petite but his atty expects felony charges related to his managed accounts. I do not understand the relationship between value of the quit claim being close to market and the difficulty of a reversal and the argument that the transfer was an intent to defraud.
Frank,It works a bit like this--let's say your son had a $10,000 car that at a fire sale he could sell for $8,000. If you give him $200 for it, it looks less like a real transfer and more like a fraudulent attempt to hide assets. But if you give him closer to the market value, the transfer begins to look more and more legitimate and therefore harder to claim as fraudulent, and consequently harder to reverse. If a home is worth $175K, and you gave him about $1,000 to get him out out of jail, it is a far easier argument to make that this was done to defraud and avoid creditors. The upside here is that there is yet no civil charges, so there is as yet nobody to defraud.Good luck.
Thank you for the clarification. I should also mention that his motivation for the quit claim is to make it less likely that his estranged wife does not receive monies from the sale of the home. Her name was not on the deed and Virginia law does provide for communal sharing in a divorce case. I am listing the home and intend to use the proceeds for another home for my son once his litigation is resolved and there are no judgements pending. I live in California.
Thank you for your follow-up.Then the spouse can potentially contest the transfer should file for divorce. While she cannot go after all of the proceeds, she can go after any profit or growth in value. If the home was worth $150K at time of marriage and you manage to sell it for $175K, she can argue that the $25K is a marital profit to which she is entitled to a half share. I cannot guarantee that she would contest it, but if she retains counsel, her counsel will almost certainly attempt to contest.Good luck.
The wife implemented the paperwork for the quit claim and moved out of the house. In the event of judgements and charge of fraud could the quit claim be justified as my son's attempt protect the asset of the house for himself?
Frank,I cannot answer that as it would be up to the judge to rule on the transfer as whether it was valid or not. But typically avoiding giving it to the spouse is not a valid basis or a justification for the transfer.Good luck and take care!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).