I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
Dear Mr. PaulMJD,
thank you very much for your answer to my question regarding the voice recording of co-workers. It is confirming that, what I had heard before, but with no approval from an official side. The Supreme Court ruling this possibility is based on which law?
The case is, that the peticular co-worker has threatened me and my wife (we all are working at the same place) to take actions and revenge after he leaves the company against us and other co-workers (he was actually bullying another co-worker, tearing off reports from official books, manipulating machines), because my wife has to deal with him as a translator. He had mentioned this even in front of the Human Resources Department, who didn't took action.
I wanted to have a proof, that he is up-to-something, because after his termination he and some followers of him were discussing in the workshop place (where many people have access to) how to proceed.
He is claiming, that I violated his privacy rights by secretly recording those conversations at the working place. My recording device though has been stolen by someone 2 days ago and I have heard threads, that he will sue me.
Therefore was the question if it is illegal to voice-record those conversations.
Thank you for your understanding
thank you very much for your response and answer. It makes it clearer now to me and I could face the person with the Supreme Court's ruling.
And I could, if I have the evidence, that he knows about the recording, tell the police, that he took my recording device, that would mean, he stole it and that is a crime in Japan.
Thank you again for your help.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).