and also i know a "Settlement demand"PRIOR to the procurement via subpoena,(they are going to NOT!)want this,paul your reading the suit right?
look at al the'extreme cruelty GROSS Misconduct,heck a judge in state ct.
sure did paul,let me REMIND you before anything is the fed WISE judge got this BIG Huge hurdle right yes,but the new"state judge"who FIRST TIME learn of this BIG mess,of a lie after lie keeping DELIBERATE a parent of no past history of drugs,alcohol,abuse etc. nothing,but kept her from even a 1 phone call???? he call it the WORSE NEW JERSEY CASE WITH CPS.
that transcript she will be procuring now,and also again keep in mind paul the fact:
1. D.Y.F.S. has a longggggg NJ propensity to doing this but NEVER ok?
not 1 time was at all EVER! proven whereas; "child was rape"and or beat up;sexually abused,bullied in foster care,and where"Worker"no good self,KNEW but"evidence"was actually EXISTING! yes paul to
have existed,"is intent to deprive"IF SHE BURY IT RIGHT PAUL?
find out later; her own supervisory personnel"sign off on things"and yet
HID THIS TOO!
2. DYFS has lost another suit in 003,05,07,multiple settlement(s)09,10
2 or more "quiet"settement,i've learn about on MY OWN sure did and few after this 2011 cps settle another suit nj,and another just last year and now the CASE YOUR READING i sent you to review just now,with atty.
survive a MOTION TO DISMISS,for"individual workers"not the agency
etc. so now?Melendez!
we are so happy get back thank you.
MOST EXPERTS for years,say the JURY is not who dyfs will want to see
and MEDIA RUNNING THE STORY PAUL WE ESTABILSH tonight!
they did cover it in 08,09,2010 but were awaiting with bells on with mom
the BIGGEST (At this point decision)on if SEVERAL not 1 but all the most horrid workers known today,anywhere,DID this and if they can beat motion to dismiss,and we FINALLY PROVE by hard,HARD WORK here;
they were not able to Get away from such GROSS beyond"mere" negligence
INTENTIONAL misconduct! no jury experts are sharing with me by video consult,phone call(s)consulting NO JURY CPS will want to hear this
with DYFS NJ KNOWN NATIONWIDE as the worse cps agency for
many years,even was on tv about this several times,PRIOR;
to /"TINA" compelling; and much warranted claim(s)and her child.
hey paul,remember sir, YOUR 1 who was not"sure either"mom suit portion remember?will survive"everything"but she did!!!
remember,your saying oh heather the child claim is THERE without a shadow of a doubt naturally easily.yep.will settle if prudent;
and the "parent"not sure premise on 1 substantiated of a fake abuse i.e. "spanking!"but look judge did not care in fed.ct.
meaning that was ten years ago! and CPS stil fail to return her!
they should have as the court say,"mom said CLEARLY''
the light spanking,was not the BASIS!(to keep a child from home)but 33 "really bad,serious horrid allegations"were what kept mom from child as APPEAL AGREE PAUL get this 04,07,09 told dyfs to properly INVESTIGATE,"stop violating mom"and child etc.to be returned,OR AT LEAST PARENTING TIME AS HER RIGHTS ARE TO BE RECOGNIZE,BUT DYFS CROOKED SELF NEVER EVEN DID NOTHING BUT HINDER,HINDER HINDER, 7.5yrs.paul!
LAST NOTE:ONE LAWYER TONIGHT DID SAY,HEATHER-MARIE
"TINA"is right,this is surely NOT state bias court,from here in
NJ NY,PA, cps workers,to fla.,michigan crooked dhs,to hawaii,all over,workers are like this,but lawyer saying to her,and myself NOT THIS TIME;
court ALLOW IT but not fed.ct.so glad we are "there"now in federal court
where i believe FINAL JUSTICE after 10 long painful years,to a once
HAPPY un-abusive family will come$ and help so many when they do win
more than i,and she has right now.
i am so happy!