Thank you for your question, Tracy. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.I am afraid that the insurer is technically correct here. They cannot disburse funds directly to anyone without proof both of relationship (if no beneficiary listing is provided), and proof that there is no other entity out there who is entitled to funds. Typically that other entity would be the estate because when someone passes away, this artificial entity is created to wind down affairs, pay off creditors, and transfer assets of the estate to heirs and beneficiaries. This life insurance proceed without direct beneficiaries would be considered an asset of the estate. The only way to receive this money is to formally reopen probate because then the estate would receive the funds and then disburse them, OR that you choose to claim there is no will and no former estate, and then use that to pursue the funds under their instructions. Anything else is not sufficient, and what they are asking you is both law and policy (I happened to work for such insurance companies prior to law and am quite familiar with the way they work going forward in this type of a situation).Good luck.
My father was an agent for this company, it is payment due him for work he did, not a life insurance policy. I apologize for not being clear about that. My sister was also a beneficiary of my father's will, but I was told it was her responsibility to correspond with them regarding her half of the monies owed.
Were they not obligated to discover these much earlier than this? The estate was open for two years. Don't companies have to review these matters on a yearly basis?
Thank you for your follow-up, William.As this was a payment due to your father and not to you, it is technically due to the estate, which is the extension of your deceased father's assets. That makes it even more 'proper' that the company require either estate paperwork or assurances that this money is going to you without an estate. The reason is because otherwise they remain potentially liable should an another party appear contesting the transacting and claiming to be an heir or beneficiary. Then the company would be required to pay this money out twice.There is no duty on part of the company to investigate their debts, it is generally the obligation of the debt holder (the creditor), to pursue those assets. Here, your father and his estate are the creditors, so it would have been their responsibility to pursue this.Good luck.
Suggesting I follow their instruction would mean lying. This document requires witnesses and needs to be notarized. My issue is that they will accept only that form. I think that is poor advice. you never adderssed the issue of producing people who knew my father. And I have learned that companies are supposed to review their records yearly. ..at least in mass. So no I am not satisfied, and not because of something you have no control over. I find thay suggestion insulting. And I signed my letter Tracy. My name is XXXXX XXXXX
My apologies, the customer name I see here is "William" and not Tracy. No disrespect was meant.I also very directly stated tht the option I provided is indeed lying and not favorable. The only reasonable and 'honest' approach is to re-open probate, something that you can do even after years of it being closed, receive the funds there, and then disburse it out, which was my initial answer to you. This has nothing to do with producing people who knew or did not know your father, you personally have no right to the funds if there is an existing estate because it is the estate who is entitled to receive the funds and then disburse them out. Take care.
You did not specifically state that all. I suggest you read what you wrote again. I am not satisfied and expect not to be charged. I will not do this endless loup of responding to you so you can keep trying to get your miney.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).