Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
A summary Judgment was obtained and renewed by the Plaintiff for which the presiding Judge favored Summary Judgment a second time on 7-08-2008. The defendant appealed because of Insufficient Delivery. The Plaintiff mailed the summons and complaint via Fed Ex and they were received by a person that resided within the household. In that it was an electronic signature, an affidavit was obtained via the Plaintiff, the Judge stated that it was OK despite the NC statutes stating that the summons and complaint should have been delivered to the addressess by a County Agent and the receiving person must have been 21 yrs of age and reside within the household.The Plaintiff obtained the Judgment but failed to have delivered it to the defendant within (5) days from issuance also. May the defendant file a motion to vacate the judgment given the circumstances provided? Caselaw has been located to validate the incorrect decision rendered by the Judge. Thank you, Cindy
Note: I failed to mention that the Summary Judgment was appealed on 7-11-2008 by the NC Court of Appeals (Raleigh,NC) for which the case was not processed. I recall receiving a letter but unable to locate. The defendant recalls something about "non-prejudice" which was electronically submitted to the District Court where one currently resides? In the mean time, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal in District Court in the county where defendant resides. The defendant was advised by Administrative personnel that Appeal Cases were not heard in District Court. They needed to be sent to Raleigh, NC (Misleading information).The defendant filed for an Extension of Time in order to comply with the Appelate11 Rule response, which was not answered by the Clerk of Courts nor the Plaintiff. The defendant did not receive a court hearing date either.Due to multiple deaths and other distractions in life, the defendant did not think a bout the matter much until a Writ of Execution arrived metered stamped (5-20-2013) at one's residential address discovered in advertisements on or about 6-02-2013. It was dated: 4-26-2013.The Writ of Possession was not served; however, the notice of sale was delivered on the day that the family's vehicle was taken (7-10-2011).
The defendant found that the Plaintiff had (2) active file numbers for the Summary Judgment. After haven gone to view the records, information provided to the Judge and parties at the hearing were no where to be found (disappeared).A writ to Stay was filed once haven received the Writ of Execution by mail. The defendant was able to schedule a hearing with the Judge that rendered the Summary Judgment to the Plaintiff on 9-5-2013. The vehicle taken on 7-10-2013 held vested interest by a family member but was not reflected on the title. It was a gft to the family from parent and is essential for the transporting of a yound adult family member to and from weekly doctor appointments.
I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).