How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Attorney Wayne Your Own Question
Attorney Wayne
Attorney Wayne, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 1506
Experience:  Practicing law since 2000.
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Attorney Wayne is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Why would an Administrative Law Judge for the DOJ apply precedent

Customer Question

Why would an Administrative Law Judge for the DOJ apply precedent from the circuit court of appeals when it conflicts with the ARB's opinion in a SOX case? The ARB is the next step for an appeal. With SOX cases, if it goes to the circuit court, it will be de novo, and will not scrutinize the ALJ's rulings. Also, the secretary of DOJ has stated that ARB precedent is to be followed by DOJ, if I recall. Precedent in question is whether once a Complainant has shown that the protected activity was a contributing factor in an adverse employment action, the employer can still escape judgement if they show that they would have taken the action in the absence of the activity. ARB has said that SOX only requires that the action be a contributing factor and allowing an employer to show it would have taken the action anyway to avoid a judgement amounts to the Complainant having to show the "contributing factor" and then prove that the employers evidence is pretext (an additional burden not in the law). My circuit court disagrees.
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  Attorney Wayne replied 3 years ago.
PLEASE DO NOT use the rating system until satisfied. Instead, please click CONTINUE CONVERSATION for more info.

Hello. Thanks for contacting us.

Wow, we don't regularly get questions from people so knowledgeable about federal administrative law. I really appreciate the focus you brought to this!

Of course, I can't read the ALJ's mind or know what his or her analysis shows. But in general, from my experience with federal administrative law, it is not unusual to cite to court opinion in an administrative law proceeding. Circuit courts are a valid source of law -- and the citation would be appropriate (just as a Supreme Court ruling would be). ALJ decisions are not self-referential. If there is, what the judge believes to be a more authoritative interpretation, he or she is supposed to apply the law, not just refer to what the board itself said in prior cases.

But you raise another interesting question: if the ALJ erred in application of the citation, then that would be a decisional error that could be appealed (as any judicial error could be appealed, whether made by an ALJ or a court judge).

If there is a right for a de novo hearing, then the appeal issue is somewhat mooted -- but not irrelevant. Often, in federal cases, there are circuit splits where one circuit disagrees with another's interpretation or application. Its the stuff many lawyers live for (or at least make a living off!) Ultimately, circuit splits remain until the Supreme Court adjudicates (if ever, since, as you know, there are limited number of cases the Supremes will take).

Additionally, while the DoJ may order its regulators and prosecutors to follow a certain procedure, ALJ's are, like judges in court, bound by law and regulation -- not directives from political and policy managers. The basic concept of adjudication in administrative law settings is really no different than that required in court. An ALJ, for the limited purpose of the board's proceedings, is like a judge -- bound by law, not by politics or policy (as other employees are).

I hope this helps frame the issue. If there are internal appeals still available within the administrative adjudicative system, then decisional error is certainly at issue (even if a court will treat the case de novo). Some sort of petition for reconsideration could be one thing to consider, with citation and proof so the ALJ may get a chance to see the error and correct it, for instance. Since each administrative agency has procedural rules of its own, it is important to look closely at that board's procedural rules to see what process might be available for this type of appeal at the ALJ level.

I wish you every success in resolving this matter.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

I can appeal to the Admin Review Board from the ALJ. I assume that they will be unlikely to side with the interp of the 4th circuit if it opposes their own interp. This is why it boggles my mind that ALJ would not abide by their interp. And of course, once I appeal to the ARB and get a decision, I cannot file for de novo review in federal court. Is there anyway to find out if this judge is mistaken without asking him in a motion?

Related Legal Questions