Welcome and thank you for your questionI am an attorney with more than 25 years of experience and I look forward to providing you true and correct information in this regard.Please remember, I can only answer what you ask and so if you have follow up questions, please post them here for full and accurate information before rating. If there are no other questions in this regard then I thank you in advance for your positive rating
What is your question in this regard, please? What information can I provide for you?
I received a notice from my company that we will now be conducting audio/video mystery shops. They want me to sign that I agree to being audio and videotaped, and say I have no choice whether or not to consent. I work for a residential apartment company in Texas.
This seems like a violation of my rights....is this legal for them to force me to consent to being videotaped without my knowledge?
Thank you and for your patience. As I only now saw your follow up to my info request and so the Answer is
It is not a violation of your rights - as long as they are giving you notice of the audio surveillance
No notice is required for simple video
Now you do not have to consent. However, you are an "at will" employee and as such they can terminate you for not going along or agreeing to their company Policy.
I suggest you can click onto this link which is an employer handbook from the Texas Labor Board and on this issue on or about page 78 it states the following
Video Surveillance • Same basic rules as for telephone monitoring-if only video is recorded, notice and consent are not mandatory (but are a good did - see below)
-if audio is recorded, notice and consent are required (for customers, place a notice on the door that the premises are subject to video monitoring) •
So if I don't consent they can just fire me?
I honestly don't feel comfortable with the video/audio monitoring...I already am on camera at work, but the whole button-camera with audio thing just seems like a complete invasion of my personal space/privacy.
But I guess if I don't like it, my only way to get around it is to find another job. That seems so messed up.
Yes, unless you have an employment contract then you can just be fired.
It is as any other policy that they may legally implement. They are not breaking any laws in this regard
I am not sure how or why you rated in the negative.
I answered all your questions even though it is not what you were hoping to hear, it is true and correct and I provided you with information to support the answer I gave
I would appreciate you considering a change of raring as such a negative rating when true and correct information is provided works towards precluding me from helping others
Remember, please, I don't write the laws and I am dismayed that you would confuse the message with the messager
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).