So if the motion holds what are my options for them trying to modify a verbal custody agreement? Can I argue that we need to have a formal custody agreement before we can start modifying it? Your thoughts?
Regarding Rule 166, when should i object? immediately upon the start of proceedings or after opening statements?
And regarding Rule 156.101A, same question as above.
The other hearings for motions I have been to are all a blur. Will the proceedings begin with an opening statement or will we go right into opposing counsel presenting their motion?
And you have been so much help. More than I could ever express. Thank You.
1. Parties and counsel are called to the counsel tables.2. Petitioner's counsel will probably start to immediately present the motion.3. If not, then you immediately say, "Your honor before we begin this hearing, I would like to call attention to the fact that... [166 stuff, that I wrote about previously]".4. If so, then, you immediately say, "Excuse me, your honor, I must respectfully XXXXX XXXXX this hearing continuing because...[166 stuff)"You have to be able to act like a lawyer, if you're representing yourself, and that means making certain that you are heard timely when you have something important to say. Worst thing that can happen is that the judge tells you to shut up. Even then, you can refuse to shut up long enough to make your statement that you have a legitimate objection to the hearing today, and that you should be heard immediately before the hearing continues. Hope this helps.
In the motion they are requesting authority to sign him up but i have a suspicion that he is already signed up. Is this grounds to have the motion stricken?
First off thank you so much for all your help. I went into court today with a confidence I would not have had without your counsel. And it turned out great!!!
Let me say this first. This motion was all about a person who wants to have less responsibility and has no respect for the fact that I work 6 days a week and she has never had to have a job to support herself and has never worked in her adult life. She was making unreasonable demands on me because she did not want to have the responsibility that falls on her because she has no commitments at all.
The judge saw it for what it was and ordered standard possession for the summer so now she can not even call on me at all for any support of summer school/ summer camp etc not only for my oldest but all the kids. He looked directly at her and said you are now responsible the entire summer for transportation to daycare/summer school/YMCA doctors appointments etc. He then said to her after her jaw fell on the table, you have to understand this is an order of the court, no buyers remorse, you brought this here and you can not do anything but what the court ordered, you may not call on you ex-husband to help out with transportation at all it is all your sole responsibility, he has a job and is unable to do these things and keep his employment. He then looked at me and said, I am not punishing you. I responded with I know your honor. He then said just wanted to make sure you understand that. But with standard possession your child support will change. So It was a good day.
I already pay child support even though it was a 50/50 split before and she is a millionaire. I do have one question maybe you can help me with. With my job I get paid my hourly wage and EMA(equipment maintenance allowance) for the USPS. Does my EMA count towards child support figures or is it excluded?
I have another question for you. I have the final temporary orders and in the section on child support it states that if I die my estate is responsible for child support."support as obligation of estate"
Is that standard for SPO?
Thanks for you reply.
Can you tell me if in your understanding the Texas Family Code requires the person who pays child support to be obligated to either provide insurance for the children or reimburse the other parent for the cost of same?
A trial court has the authority to order a parent to maintain a life insurance policy for the child's benefit for so long as the child support obligation exists. Niskar v. Niskar, 136 S.W.3d 749, 759 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, no pet.); Grayson v. Grayson, 103 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2003, no pet.).
I apologize for not being as specific as I should have I was referring to health insurance but did not state that.
Thank you it does help.
They are working on the child support calculations. They are using my pay stub and YTD figure to calculate child support. Is this standard practice? I only ask because my first paycheck for the year was for the last 2 weeks in 2012.
Thank you for your help in this matter. Looking for clarification about the judge's temporary orders vs. the ones written by the lawyer. I rec'd from the court a copy of the judge's orders.
- Regular Standard Possession was ordered for during summer school (i
pick up Fri 6pm and drop Sun 6pm).
- For after summer school is over (which it is done now), the judge
ordered "Standard Possession with a Thursday exception" (i pick up
would pick up thurs 4pm and return monday a.m.; i.e. Sunday night is
now added back into my possession).
- no one asked for any change in possession at all in court, but he
ordered it... i think to show ex-wife to not be so petty going to court
about 5 days of summer school driving. and he said he was not
penalizing me, but since i now have to pay over $600 a month child
support that i don't have and never had to pay before due to 50/50
possession, it does feel like a penalty.
- What exactly does "election" mean regarding "thursday election"... i.e.
can I 'elect' to not take the thursdays w/the kids? because the lawyer's
temp orders do not use the word 'election' at all... so i am not sure.
- if i can completely opt out of thurs w/the kids, can she get me in any
trouble for not taking any thursdays?
- if that is within my right according to this 'exception' the judge
mentioned, would i have to give her written notice for every thurs or just
opt out of thurs altogether?
- if we can safely 'elect' to not take the kids on any thurs, can we further
'elect' to just keep it as regular Standard Possession (fri 6pm to sun
6pm) instead of fri 4pm (if we don't do the thurs) to mon a.m. - or only if
she agrees to that?
- the goal is to get back to the 50/50 possession at some point and not
have to pay child support any longer, but if she only has to now keep the
kids one more night per week than she used to when we did have
50/50, she can do that forever and still get the $600 a month on top of
it! what motivation would she ever have to go back to the 50/50 if she's
not overburdened by having to keep them 12 out of every 14 days like
she was the first 3 weeks after court? she was pretty surprised by the
judge's ruling too so i'm hoping she'll soon approach me for 50/50
again. but she'll never do that if we have close to the previous 50/50 but
she still gets the full amount of support.
- i want her to have the kids wed/thurs/sun (and me only have them every
1st/3rd/5th fri-sun)... but don't know if this is within the orders and how to
approach any of this if the lawyer begins to say A) i have to do the thurs
and/or B) cannot opt for regular standard possession.
Thank you. I hope she and i can eventually work out some 'final orders' between ourselves... but in the meantime:
Judge's orders from the court reporter:
"While the child is in summer school, you will have first, third, and fifth weekend standard visitation.
Once summer school is completed, you will have first, third, and fifth standard visitation with a Thursday election. So that will be Thursday after school you are responsible for pickup. Take the children to school on Friday. Return the children to school on Monday."
Orders written by the atty:
"Temporary possession order until july 27 (once (until) shad has completed summer school) (Until july 27, except as otherwise explicitly provided in these additional Temporary Orders, IT IS ORDERED christopher spoonts shall have the right to possession of the children as follows:
Weekends. On weekends, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the first, third, and fifth Friday of each month and ending at 6:00 p.m. the following Sunday.
Temporary possession order beginning July 27 (once shad has completed summer school) until further order of this court:
Weekends: On weekends, beginning at the time the children's school is dismissed on the first, third, and fifth Friday of each month (or 4:00pm if school is not in session) and ending at the time the children's school regularly resumes the following Monday (or 8:00 a.m. if school is not in session).
Weekend possession extended by a holiday: Except as otherwise explicitly provided, if a weekend period of possession begins on a Friday that is a school holiday during the regular school term or a federal, state, or local holiday during the summer months when school is not in session, or if the period ends on or is immediately followed by a Monday that is such a holiday, that weekend period of possession shall begin at the time the children's school is dismissed on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday holiday or school holiday or shall end at the time the children's school regularly resumes following that Monday holiday or school holiday, as applicable.
Thursdays: On Thursday of each week, beginning at the time the children's school is dismissed (or 4:00 pm if school is not in session) and ending at the time the children's school regularly resumes on Friday (or 8:00 am if school is not in session)."
(when i don't have them for the weekend, they would just be here the one thursday night... which seems like a disruption for them to me.)
It does help.
If I was not able to take them for anytime of my possession I would just have to give written notice before my time of possession?
For instance if I was not able to take a Thursday I would just give written notice prior to my time of pickup for that Thursday?
If I needed to take them back before Monday morning would I just provide written notice before my possession time started?
Thanks so much.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).