Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
I hope this message finds you well, present circumstances excluded. As a matter of course, in Illinois, and most states for that matter, on the civil side, theft is called conversion.
Below is an excerpt description of conversion in Illinois:
Illinois courts have defined the tort of "conversion" as any unauthorized act that deprives a person of his or her property permanently or for an indefinite time. Illinois Jurisprudence, Personal Injury and Torts § 10:01. The essence of a cause of action for conversion is the wrongful deprivation of one who has a right to the immediate possession of the object unlawfully held, or the wrongful deprivation of property from the person entitled to possession. Id. The Illinois Supreme Court held to establish a cause of action for conversion, a plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) the plaintiff has a right to the property; (2) the plaintiff has an absolute and unconditional right to the immediate possession of the property; (3) the plaintiff made a demand for possession; and (4) the defendant wrongfully and without authorization assumed control, dominion, or ownership over the property. Cirrincione v. Johnson, 184 Ill.2d 109, 114 (1998).
As to the issue at hand, in order to be able to deduct the amount lost as to this civil conversion, you are going to have to produce a judgment against the individual relative to the amount converted. Moreover, you will also have to produce documentation of reasonable attempts to collect that have been unsuccessful.
In other words, you are going to have to sue this individual with the cause of action being conversion and get a judgment against him. You will then make an attempt to collect (garnish wages, place a lien on property, etc.). If/when you are unable to collect, you will then be able to file for the tax deduction under the IRS 165 provision.
Let me know if you have any additional questions or comments. I want to make sure you are satisfied with the responses given herein.
Best wishes going forward!
The cost of doing what you recommend would be prohibtive. I have been told that there would be a way to comply to IRC 165 (3) under theft withiout getting a criminal judgement against this contractor. The issue is detremining what wording is necessary, We have already gone through bankrultcy court. Yiou have not told me anything I did not already now and I believe that you are miustaken about needing a criminal judgment against this person to get a tax deduction.
I come from a family of contingency attorneys. I know all about this. Therre are no assets to collect here. I have tried for years and can not get anythiong from this contractor.
I believe that there is a way to get suffcient data for the IRS to consider this a theft loss without a trial. Possibly an admission by the contrzactor as to what transpired.
You have not told me anbything I did not know and I believe that you are wrong. I am completly unsatisfied with your reply and do not believe that you understnad Illinois state law in conjuction to thei IRS issue.
The first question the IRS will need answered is whether or not this was a theft. Absent a criminal conviction, the best way to prove theft is via civil judgment (called conversion). Like stated above, if you can get the man to admit in writing that he converted your money or property, then you may also meet this burden. Otherwise, it is a pretty difficult burden to meet under the Internal Revenue Code Section 165(c)(2).
I tis actuall IRS COde Section 165(c) 3 not 2. 3 deals with tehft. Again you have not given me any Illinois civil law whuich is what I have asked for. I am done wasdting my time telling you what I want and not getting an Illinois State civil law response.
If I get chrged any more the the $5 for this I will bitterly complain.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).