Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO ***** CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
this is the full conclusion, I could not put everything on the other time
As the defendant discussed in this reply brief and the brief previously filed. The Court erred in these respects (1) not Considering that the defendant did not have her right to testify, bring evidence and witnesses for her counterclaim during trial according to practice book section 10-54 (2) Not considering the effect of the Fact Finder failing to notify the defendant’s counsel of the validity of the defendant’s counterclaim after the trial as he promised so that he could at least argue it in the brief (3) not considering the effect of Fact Finder refusing to extend the time for the defendant’s counsel to put in his argument in a closing brief (4) The court did not consider the effect of the Fact Finder’s error on the contradictions of his Findings (5) Believing the issues not on Fact Finder’s report are not relevant (6) prejudging the defendant’s case. (7) Depriving defendant of meaningful due process. The defendant’s right to due process has been violated because Superior Court affirmed judgment that was pasted against her without the due process of hearing her counterclaim and briefing her issues. The Superior Court’s decision not to remand the case back because it believes that the Fact Finder considered the issues on defendant’s counterclaim is erroneous. It is not legally and logically correct. Therefore the decision of the Superior Court should be reversed so that the defendant could have a proper trial that she is justifiably entitled.
Can I use those citations, are they from supreme court or Connecticut court?
Can I add all of that to the conclusion I already wrote, will it not be too long?
Thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it.
Good day ,
In my appeal issue where I said that the superior court use the fact finder's contradicting report to decide the case. Is it okay that I said it is erroneous, Factually and legally incorrect? and can I use a citation for right to due process on it?
Good morning and thank you for your help all these months with my appeal and other legal questions. Today, I have a new question. I have some health problem. For the past few months I sometimes feel empty headed, fainting, and very sleepy. Around January when I was driving, I suddenly started having these symptoms and I pulled out of the road quickly and called 911. I was taken in an ambulance to the hospital. I slept from where I was taken to the hospital and slept for hours in the hospital before I was okay. In March, I experience the same thing when I was driving and I quickly pulled out of the road also. But this was close to my house which has many trees and very narrow road. as I got out of the road, I was very dizzy the car rolled and stop right in front of a tree touching the tree. I called 911 and I was taken by ambulance to the hospital and I slept for hours like the other time and I was fine when I woke up. The next day, a police man and another man with a plain clothes came to my house and gave me a ticket. When I read the ticket it said that I was adjusting my seat and lost control of my car. I went to the police station and spoke with the police that wrote the report. He said he was not there at the scene that the police that was there gave him the information he wrote on the report. he gave me the number of the person to speak with, that he can not remove any information on a report. When I spoke with the person she said the police at the scene said he was not told that I was dizzy or why I got out of the road. She said the information on the report stays. I am going to the court because I pleaded not guilty. I really don't care about the amount on the ticket, I can give many that amount without problem as I always love to donate to the police and I am not reporting anything to the insurance because there was no damage to the car or injury to me. I have a problem with a police just writing what he did not see and what he was not told. That could have been a more serious issue that could impact someone's life and not a Little over a hundred dollars ticket. Also I have to have the right information for the doctors to access my health situation. I told the first lady at the scene that I was dizzy and told the ambulance people and everybody in the hospital that I was dizzy and fainting. I even remember telling the 911 operator that I was dizzy or fainting. It is what was written on the hospital record.
My question is what should be my argument in this situation? I have the hospital record and document to prove that the dent in front of my car was from previous accident.
I have a court day coming in few day for the traffic ticket I got due to the wrong police report which I wrote to you about earlier. My question is what should be my appropriate defense and is it proper and legal for me to file a counter suit against the police for court to make them to write a supplemental report on the incident.
There is no insurance claims going on on the matter. will not correcting the report have any negative effect on my driving record?
I have my appeal argument coming up in few days. I just caught a deadly bacteria with my PD dialysis treatment. It is the most painful thing to experience. I can not sit or stand. The doctor said it is a hard to kill bacteria, that I am going to be down for at least three weeks. I am going to be having antibiotics flood in my stomach everyday and take antibiotics tablet too for two week. Is it possible to get appeal argument moved for good cause? because my doctor said I am not going to be able to do anything for at least three weeks. What can I do, what motion should I file?
I am trying to appeal the appellate Court decision in the supreme Court and I have been sick. I just got kidney transplant in University of Pennsylvania hospital. They want me to be in Pennsylvania for three weeks for testing and monitoring and treatment in case of rejection and tomorrow is the deadline which is 20 day to file to supreme Court in Connecticut were Iive. What should I do/.
Thank you for your response.Based off of all of this I would say that the court will claim all of your claims are already decided (res judicata), with the exception of the malicious prosecution and the fraudulent billing would be your causes of action. You can file a complaint to the state bar about the fraudulent billing and conduct of the attorney with his client, but you are going to likely be outside of the statute of limitations for any actual malpractice claims.
My concern is that what if I waste time writing the amendment and the Court agreed with what the Clerk said. Then I must have wasted valuable time on it. Do Lawyers have to register with US supreme court to be able to take a case there? and do the US supreme Court not accept pro Se?
Thank you for your reply.Yes, lawyers have to be registered to practice before the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will take a pro se appeal, but it is hard for attorneys with experience to get a case heard by the Supreme Court, so imagine how hard it is to have a pro se case heard by the Supreme Court.I understand you not wanting to waste time, but you have two conflicting orders too and the clerk has not explained the second conflicting order adequately that granted you the right to amend. So you file you amended brief with a motion to reconsider based on citing the order allowing you leave to amend.
You are so wonderful, your answer makes a lot of sense, that was exactly what I felt and what is correct, after being in this case for six years, I now know that the Court is permitted to do whatever they want and if they tell me they already made decision and no amendment permited, there will be nothing I can do if I already miss the chance to try to get justice from US Supreme Court. I am writing a motion of clarification to be submitted today, should I then write a motion for reconsideration also, stating the conflicting decision as one of my reasons for them to reconsider the petition. At least that will hold my time to go to Supreme Court and give me clarification on the decisions.
I have not corrected the errors yet because I did not know if it was going to be permitted. So I don't have that to send now with the motion of reconsideration. So can I just send the motions for clarification under section 60-1 of Connecticut practice book and a motion for extension of time to file a motion of reconsideration? Then I will put in the motion for reconsideration with the corrected petition next week.It is ten days today since the Court made the decision, it will be too late next week if I don't extend the time and put my concern in today.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).