Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
Thank you for your question. Thank you also for requesting me directly. Please allow me assist you this evening.Generally if a trustee is sued for anything that is not trust related, then the trust is safe. Trustees are caretakers of the trust, they are not owners of the money, so the assets are generally safe.A beneficiary may be a different story. Beneficiaries generally have no control over the trust but are entitled to funds based on certain conditions. If a beneficiary is sued, then her share of the estate may be intercepted by the judgment holder should a judgment take place, or if the beneficiary has the right to demand funds, the judgment holder could step into the shoes of the beneficiary and likewise demand those funds but sent over to him. The answer does not really change if the assets are money or a property, it is just with a property trustees may need to sell the home and convert into into assets if the trust so designates but a judgment holder or creditor cannot generally compel such behavior.Good luck.
So in theory, wouldn't it be a solution to gain liability protection on the trust assets if there are multiple trustors and multiple beneficiaries?
Dan,I am sorry but I do not quite understand as to what exactly you mean by 'liability protection' in this case. Let me illustrate. Let me call the 3 trustees A, B, and C, and the 3 beneficiaries X, Y, Z. If A, B, or C have issues with creditors, that does not affect the trust (so long as the issue is not trust related). But if X has a creditor issue, X's share of the trust could be intercepted if it is ever disbursed. Same with Y or Z. The trust can provide some liability protection if those assets are never dispersed but the judgment would still remain against that beneficiary. Hope that clarifies.
Dan,There is some protection, but not all. Notice that I stated that if beneficiaries are able to demand funds, then the creditor would likewise obtain that same right. As for reallocation, it depends on whether the trust permits such removals. A trustee generally cannot sell or 'reallocate' funds if they re deemed to go to the beneficiary, so any removal of assets goes to the beneficiaries first. The schemes you are listing about reallocation is not really valid because trust assets are not split in terms of which beneficiary has what portion, it is likewise based on trust language. A beneficiary of the trust cannot generally lose her share of the trust based on reallocations. Commingling does not protect assets, remember that beneficiaries have a potential interest and creditors do not care where that trust asset came from, if it exists and the bene is entitled to it, they can pursue it.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).