Hi, your prior expert opted out. I'll be happy to assist you today. It's very unusual for someone to answer any allegation of a complaint as "admitted for jurisdictional purposes only", and it is not a response sanctioned by the court rules which state a party can only answer an allegation in one of three ways -admit, deny with a specific reason as to why the allegation is denied, or state that the answering party is without sufficient knowledge to provide a response.
So what this particular answer seems to be attempting to do is admit with a qualification, which isn't necessarily allowed by the court rules. Specifically, what he/she appears to want to do is admit to the allegation for purposes of jurisdiction. What jurisdiction means is that the court has proper legal authority over the person(s) and the subject of the case - for example a court in California usually would not have personal jurisdiction of a case where all the parties lived in New York. Or, a federal court
wouldn't have subject matter jurisdiction between two residents of the same state or a claim of residents of two states less than $77,000. So, what your particular answering party seems to be answering is that he does not contest personal or subject matter jurisdiction that the allegation may bring up, but he reserves the right to challenge as it relates to the substance of the elements of the particular cause of action. It's not technically a correct answer, you cannot qualify an admission.
I believe this answers your question. However, if you need clarification or have follow-up questions regarding this matter, I will be happy to continue our conversation – select the Reply to Expert or Continue Conversation button. If you are otherwise satisfied with my response, please leave a positive rating as it is the only way I am able to get credit for my answers. Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX wish you all the best with this matter.