How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Chris T., JD Your Own Question
Chris T., JD
Chris T., JD, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 4751
Experience:  Experienced in both state and federal court.
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Chris T., JD is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

For the defendants attorneys want & request for a claim to

This answer was rated:

For the defendants attorney's want & request for a claim to be amended to describe “legal theory / theories”.....
If an arrested person...
(in the custody of a law enforcement officer with non-regulation handcuffs behind the back)...

Is transported in the back seat of a vehicle with such a confined space...
(against the arrested persons "twice request" to be transported instead in an ‘available’ vehicle with ample room for the arrested person)...

That as a result thereof, the arrested person suffers several contusive lacerations, blood running down the crack of their ass And PERMANENT "DISABLING" damage to the L4 & L5 Vertebrates, and Destruction of the L5 - S1 Disc....

The included description of “TORT, and the associated Statutes for injury by a governing body or employee thereof” are being claimed by the defendant as insufficient and lacking in that it does not state a “theory.

Forgive me, but aside from and beyond simply stating their liability to/for the injury for their actions/ lack of actions, and including the statutes to those parameters,
I am at such a loss to/for this Pleading/ “Theory” thing and what to put in it, as it apparently needs to be defined for them to an acceptable degree beyond what I have put as described above, so….

Please tell me the legal "THEORY / THEORIES” that you think would / should be described in the ‘amended’ claim filing.

I am thinking >
• “Strict Liability”, and/or (DUH !)
• “Delict”, and/or
• “Negligence”, and/or
• “False Arrest’, and/or
• “Assault”
And, what /how should be simply stated ??

TexLawyer : Good evening. I'll be assisting you with your question.
TexLawyer : Based on what you've told me, your best legal theories are: negligence and a violation of your civil rights via excessive and unreasonable force.
TexLawyer : In order to prove a negligence claim, you have to show three things: (1) there was a legal duty owed to you, (2) that duty was breached; and (3) you were harmed as a result.
TexLawyer : In your case, the police have a duty to keep you safe, or at least not inflict unnecessary damage on you.
Customer: I am frustrated as it is blatant and obvious i was injured as a result of his failure/refusal to provide for my safety health and welfare once placed in handcuffs and they "knew" (admitted on recording) of the discompfort in this situation as well as it being an industry KNOWN issue with this vehicle (a ford explorer) but I guess I need to know what to say in the paragraph (in the amended claim) to make this fly
TexLawyer : Second, they breached that duty by the way they placed you in the car (you will have to fill in the facts regarding how you were treated). With this element, you need to show that their actions were negligent, that is, that they fell below the standard of what a reasonable person would do.
Customer: the case is a piece of cake as much documentation has been being gathered, and i will have a hay-day with this damn city if it goes to trial, BUT I just want the "THEORY" I's dotted & T's crossed so it will get past this crucial stage
TexLawyer : Third, you have to show (or, at least, allege) that them putting you in this position caused the injury to your back. While you don't need an expert at this point, at some point during the litigation, you will need an expert to testify to this point and quantify the damage.
Customer: have the most respected physician in the count :-)
Customer: *county
Customer: they are just crying about what my "THEORY" is
TexLawyer : I understand. Your primary theory is negligence, and you should throw in a civil rights violation (the city will do whatever they can to avoid a finding that one of their police officers violated a person's civil rights, as that is a political nightmare.
Customer: civil rights as to?
Customer: As to Unreasonably failed/refused to providre for my safety?
Customer: this city is loved by "NO-ONE"
Customer: so in a paragraph, what/how would you state
Customer: Negigence
Customer: ?
Customer: *negligence
TexLawyer : Police brutality is a violation of your civil rights. Arguably, they put you in a position they KNEW would cause you pain and potentially damage. It is basically an extension of negligence. Negligence is causing your injury, but not on purpose (through their own inattention). Police brutality is doing the same, but intentionally. You could argue that they knew what they were doing was harming you, so they were causing your injury on purpose, just the same as if they were striking you.
Customer: ok >>>
Customer: another thing thing
Customer: >
TexLawyer : You would state your theories in separate paragraphs: Cause of Action #1 - Negligence (then explain the elements as I've described them to you). Then the same for the civil rights violation.
Customer: if i pursue wilful act by the officer to injur me, will that spoil the responsibilty of the city ?
TexLawyer : No, they are still responsible since the officers were acting within the scope of their employment.
Customer: and after I am done with the city can i pursue the officer personly for willfully attampting to injur me ?
Customer: i do have both/all of those aspects
Customer: I just dont want the city to get off because he knowingly did it to me
TexLawyer : Also, on that point, you need to allege vicarious liability. Vicarious liability is what makes an employer responsible for the actions of their employees.
TexLawyer : Below is a link to more information on the doctrine of vicarious liability:
TexLawyer : If you want to sue the police officers and the city together, you must do it at the same time.
TexLawyer : Once your claim is adjudicated, you can't go back and pursue other people or entities.
Customer: seperate paraghraphs/cause/theories?
TexLawyer : It is barred by collateral estoppel if you don't bring it all at the same time.
TexLawyer : Yes, separate paragraphs for each theory.
Customer: I cannot pursue him seperately for mailsciousness?
TexLawyer : No, since it all comes out of the same episode, you have to bring everything at once. You can pursue him for assault (intentional tort), but you have to do it all at the same time.
Customer: bummer
Customer: in oregon the statutes provide a maximum and he /the city are both named
Customer: I can puruse federaly after the state level ?
Customer: here for negligence x 2 or 3
Customer: then federal for VOCR
TexLawyer : If you win in state court, you cannot go to federal court and get another judgment. Essentially, you can't get a double recovery.
Customer: ignore the 2 or 3
Customer: OH
Customer: K
Customer: too bad your not here
Customer: hard to find anyone who will contingent for a mere .5M$
TexLawyer : I know. It sounds like you have a good case.
Customer: smack-down
Customer: :-)
TexLawyer : What happened to you sounds terrible.
Customer: Ok so lastly then could you do ma a favor and make a paraghraph like you would put as the theory??
TexLawyer : Once you told them of your problems, they were no notice.
Customer: >
Customer: I did provide them notice accoringly to statute
Customer: :-)
Customer: I did file acocrding to statute
Customer: they are just whinning they dont understand what they are defending against
Customer: ;lol
TexLawyer : Unfortunately, no. There are two reasons. First, I don't know all the facts. Second, we are not allowed to created an "attorney-client" relationship. Drafting part of your complaint would cross that line.
Customer: oh k
Customer: Um>>>
Customer: how does this look to you (an opinion) of course
TexLawyer : They are entitled to notice, so you just have to explain as best you can that you are suing for negligence, and explain how you believe they were negligent.
TexLawyer : It looks strong, based on what you've told me. That said, I always reserve judgment until I hear what the other side would argue.
Customer: "for want of theory by defendants, plaitiff cliams negligence and or Strict liability and or vicarious laibilty to the ends that the defendant was liable to provide for the plaitiff an environment free of likely or plausble injury to witch the defendant did injur the plaintiff and is therefore liable"
Customer: ???
TexLawyer : You need to have a paragraph for each legal theory, and you need to explain how the facts apply to it. For example, if I was alleging negligence for a car wreck, it would go something like this:
TexLawyer : The elements of negligence are as follows: (1) that the defendants owed a duty to the plaintiff; (2) that the defendants breached that duty; and (3) that the plaintiff was damaged as a result.
Customer: wow S I M P L E !! i AM FLABERGHASTED THAT HE IS EVEN DEMANDING IT AS IT WAS ALL EXPLAINED IN MY NOTICE OPINTENT. ok your "great" man... the counsel for the defendant is NOT happy that he is going up against a citizen, and I think he suspects he will lose badly and he wont get to play allot of the games attorneys often play. IS THERE A WAY i CAN GET BACK TO you DIRECTLY in the furure?
TexLawyer : The plaintiffs owed a duty of care to the plaintiff because drivers owe a general duty of care to other drivers. The defendant breached this duty [explain how wreck happened]. The plaintiff was damaged as a result [explain harm}.
TexLawyer : Yes, you can get back to me directly by posting a question with "this question is for TexLawyer" in the title.
Customer: an officerr of the law has a duty to the detained and restrained to provide for their physical safety as a restrained person is without the abillity to provide it to himself>>?
Customer: >
TexLawyer : If you do that, I will see the question and respond. The other experts know that when a customer does that, others are not to answer.
Customer: Yes, you can get back to me directly by posting a question with "this question is for TexLawyer" in the title. ?????????????????
TexLawyer : What you posted looks good.
Customer: I am missing something ...
Customer: maybe my order number?
TexLawyer : Yes, you asked if there was a way to get back to me directly.
Customer: 13060149-697?
Customer: put this question is for JACUSTOMER-857b662r ????
Customer: oh jeeze
TexLawyer : No, if you want to get back to me, post a question with "this question is for TexLawyer" in the title. If you do that, I'll see it and get back to you.
Customer: do you have a link I can copy down?
TexLawyer : To get back to this question?
Customer: YES
Customer: you
Customer: BACK TO YOU
Customer: :-p
TexLawyer : Like I said, you just post a new question with "this question is for TexLawyer" in the title. Or, you can just post on the end of this question. After we are finished tonight, you can just continue to post on this question and we can continue later.
TexLawyer : We are not allowed to give out our real names.
TexLawyer : My name on here is TexLawyer.
TexLawyer : Yes, you can.
Customer: *Theories?
Customer: thanks I love you... wich me luck.
Customer: John Blackburn
Customer: :-D
TexLawyer : Good luck!
Customer: *wish me luck and good night
TexLawyer : If there isn't anything else I can do for you, please remember to "rate" my answer. Good luck and have a great night!
Customer: peice of cake.:-)
TexLawyer : Can I do anything else for you?
TexLawyer : If not, please remember to "rate" my answer (that's how I get credit for my work). Have a great night.

after I have created the amended filing can I run it by you for a thumbs up ?


I gave you RAVES like you deserve ! ;-)also, can I some-way secure you as a consultant and pay you from proceeds of successful outcome?


fyi, I am a retired (not by choice) automotive master technician with over 30 years of experience so if you have ***ANY*** questions about cars/trucks/rv's/boats... I will 110% GLADLY provide "you" $ saving information from my massive knowledge bank for free. Hope you & yours are doing well & are happy. Thanks: John Henry Blackburn XXXXXXXXXX /p>

Chris T., JD, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 4751
Experience: Experienced in both state and federal court.
Chris T., JD and 7 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Sure, you can run it by me once you've finished. Unfortunately, I can't be hired by you. The terms of Just Answer do not permit experts to take clients from the website. I will, however, be glad to answer any questions you have.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.












I believe I
am able to show each of these with admissions by the defendant/s and or agent
for the defendant/s.

all out of
the cities (DEFENDANTS) debt owed to the public safety (failing & or
refusing to provide for safe equipment used by their police dept.; failing and
or refusing to provide their police with current standard police operating
procedure manual/s and or testing and or regulation equipment, and the officers
willful knowing act that injured me.

THOUGHTS FROM YOU PLEASE.............. especially about Q1 ?

Hi! Thanks for requesting me. To answer your question, you will likely have to sign a medical release. The other side has a right to discovery which typically includes a medical release. The reason they have a right to your medical records is to make sure the injury you are claiming was not preexisting or had some other cause. That does not mean, however, that they should have an open ended right to your records. You should limit the release to medical records related to your case.

As for your claims, I think you are headed down the right track. You need a separate paragraph for each legal theory, and facts regarding how you believe the plaintiff's conduct fits. So, you would have a heading for "assault." You will spell out the elements (just Google "assault & elements), then explain how the facts meet those elements.

I hope that answers your question. If not, feel free to ask follow up questions. Good luck!

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it. Lee Michigan

Meet The Experts:

  • Tina



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
< Last | Next >
  • Tina's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
  • Ely's Avatar


    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • JPEsq's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor
  • Law Educator, Esq.'s Avatar

    Law Educator, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
  • FiveStarLaw's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    25 years of experience helping people like you.
  • Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.'s Avatar

    Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.
  • Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation and administration.

Related Legal Questions