· Eliminate the existing 12 “safe harbor” provisions that allowed institutions to compensate college recruiters and admissions officers based on success in enrolling students.
· Allow for merit-based adjustments to employee compensation as long as such payments are not based, in any part, directly or indirectly upon success in securing enrollments or the award of financial aid.
· Define those covered by incentive compensation rules as “an entity or person engaged in any student recruitment or admission activity or in making decisions about the award of financial aid.”
· Disallow incentive payments “based in any part, directly or indirectly” upon success in securing enrollments or the award of financial aid.
In sum, institutions are required to take steps to further assure decoupling of financial compensation and the results of recruitment efforts. You can find those regulation at this link.
You appear to be alleging that since the college terminated you for not meeting its required recruitment numbers, the college may have wrongfully terminated you in light of these regulations (which establish public policy against recruitment quotas). I have done a fair amount of research and am not aware of any cases that state the premise that these regulations create a public policy. Second, the federal regulations do not go to a college's creation of recruitment quotas but only that a recruitment officer cannot be compensated in variance with the amount of persons they recruit. Thus, I'm doubtful that such a claim would success ed; not to say unequivocally that it would not succeed. There is a statute of limitations of one year for wrongful termination from the date of termination.
Being denied unemployment, based on what you've explained, does not make sense. Unless the employer can somehow prove that you intentionally were not meeting the quota or were engaged in horseplay on the job, your unemployment claim should be granted. You probably will want to appeal the denial of those benefits on that basis.
I believe this answers your question. However, if you need clarification or have follow-up questions regarding this matter, I will be happy to continue our conversation – select the Reply to Expert or Continue Conversation button. If you are otherwise satisfied with my response, please leave a positive rating as it is the only way I am able to get credit for my answers. Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX wish you all the best with this matter.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).