How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Lucy, Esq. Your Own Question

Lucy, Esq.
Lucy, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 19872
Experience:  Lawyer
26798026
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Lucy, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Hi Lucy, this is related to what we talked about. Some of

Resolved Question:

Hi Lucy, this is related to what we talked about.

Some of the arguments could go both for a New Trial reconsideration motion and for a 1.540 motion.

The general intention here is

1) to amend the "deemed motion" with prior leave of court, by requiring to add the arguments thta I had developed in prior motion thta hasn't been ruled yet.

2) to file new 1.540 motions. I have filed one previously,but I have further counts now

3) To file a motion for reconsideration of thedenied new triial motion

4) to ask the judge to hear all motions at net hearing.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Hi,

I know that's your intention, but what is your question about that? Are you asking if you can combine your arguments into a single motion?
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
No, just to hear all motions at the hearing instead of just the deemed motion and if could I file more than one 1.540 motion or should I amend ?
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
It depends on how much time you have before the hearing. If there's enough time for the other party to respond to the motion before the hearing, yes, you can ask the judge to hear all of the issues together. If there's not enough time, then he definitely won't, but it may be possible to ask to continue the hearing to listen to every issue at once.

You need the judge's permission to amend, so I can't say you "should" do that - he may say no. But, you have the option of asking if he will allow, which will ensure that all issues will be heard at the same time, and then filing a separate motion if he won't allow it.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Ok, but my question was actually to file the motions first and then to send them to the judge and ask for them to be heard all at next hearing. The reason why is that the judge will say no to everything and whatever, but i need to do what I need to do to preserve my rights for the appeal.
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
I was assuming that was the plan. Still, the judge has discretion to refuse to hear everything at the same hearing, depending on how much time there between when you file and the scheduled date. There needs to be enough time for the other party to respond.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
I believe I need 2 more days at the library and 2-3 days to digest and come up with the motions, so by next Friday May 24th I will have served and filed hopefully.The hearing is on June 4th.
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
You need at least 10 days for the other party to respond before the hearing. That's exactly 10 days, but you need to give extra time for service by mail. The judge probably won't allow it. You'd likely need to postpone the hearing, because even if he would allow it, you wouldn't have time to review their response and prepare.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Thank you for the information.

service by mail> service is by email


Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Then you don't need the extra time, but the judge may still think you're cutting it too close.
Lucy, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 19872
Experience: Lawyer
Lucy, Esq. and 15 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Forgot to ask you this: on which rule is the 10 days you mention based ?
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Thank you !
But is there any rule for time limits to serve by mail a pre-trial statement before a trial hearing ?
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Anything like that would usually be subject to the general rules of discovery and any pre-trial orders where the judge ordered the parties to exchange exhibit lists or something like that.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
OK, I guess that you refer to RULE 1.140. DEFENSES (3) If the court permits or requires an amended orresponsive pleading or a more definite statement, thepleading or statement shall be served within 10 daysafter notice of the court’s action.

>>>> Responses to the pleadings or statements shall be served within 10 days of service of the pleadings or statements.

I am talking here about a pre-trial statement.

It should be served 10 days before the hearing if I understand you well, so as to allow the other party to respond ?
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Rule 1.140 doesn't have anything to do with pretrial statements. It refers to what happens when a party files a Motion for More Definite Statement after receiving a summons, or a party seeks leave to amend the Complaint, Counterclaim, or Reply.

I was talking about the time for a motion to amend or a motion for new trial to be served under 1.530, because you were asking if you could have the hearing for the motion you're filing on at the hearing already scheduled. The rule gives the other party 10 days to respond, and the judge usually won't put the hearing for a motion on the same day the opposition is due. The judge wants time to read and prepare for the hearing, just as the parties do.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Thank you Lucy, but which rules apply here? Can a pre-trial order be such that it orders one party to file a pre-trial statement almost one day before the hearing, for instance ? is there not a rule to protect the rights of defense in such matters?
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
There could be, but the judge isn't going to issue any pretrial statements after the trial is heard. The judge is basically treating your letter as a Motion for Rehearing, so he would apply 1.530.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
This is unrelated, Lucy, but thank you for reminding. My actual question is that I was served a pre-trial statement of Plaintiff 3 days before the hearing and with over 800 of pages to review from the discoveries. There is no mistake on the part of the Plaintiff here, he was following an order of the judge, its just that the order of the judge issued on December 19th reached me after Xmas and next the pre-trial statement reached me after New Year and there was only 3 business days left to prepare any answer
Expert:  Lucy, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
If you didn't object at the time, it's too late now. If you're saying that the judge allowed papers to be served right before the hearing before, that doesn't necessarily mean that he would do it again with an Opposition to a Motion. I'm not saying that you can't ask. I'm just saying that the judge may say no.
Lucy, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 19872
Experience: Lawyer
Lucy, Esq. and 15 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Last | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it. Lee Michigan
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Tina

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8436
    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/MU/multistatelaw/2011-11-27_173951_Tinaglamourshotworkglow102011.64x64.jpg Tina's Avatar

    Tina

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8436
    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RA/ratioscripta/2012-6-13_2955_foto3.64x64.jpg Ely's Avatar

    Ely

    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    19941
    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/FL/FLAandNYLawyer/2012-1-27_14349_3Fotolia25855429M.64x64.jpg FiveStarLaw's Avatar

    FiveStarLaw

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    8189
    25 years of experience helping people like you.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/jespoag/2008-12-17_222355_jessepic.jpg JPEsq's Avatar

    JPEsq

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    2132
    Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/gsenmartin/2008-04-22_214950_me1.jpg Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.'s Avatar

    Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    110
    7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/PA/PaulmoJD/2013-10-10_195858_JAImage.64x64.jpg Law Educator, Esq.'s Avatar

    Law Educator, Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    31621
    JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/dkaplun/2009-05-17_173121_headshot_1_2.jpg Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    15975
    Multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation and administration.