Thank you for your question. Please allow me to assist you with your concerns.The answer is 'yes', a judge can either choose to refuse to allow the exhibit in outright based on the lack of the redaction, or request that the exhibit not be viewed until the modifications are made to the evidence as ordered. However the opposing party must make a timely objection to the initial offer because if the opposing party fails to contest, then the evidence is considered acceptable 'as-is' and is generally no longer able to be removed or rescinded, or otherwise modified or redacted. This is less a case law issue and more of an evidentiary issue where a judge is generally given deference based on his order her ruling once the evidence was accepted.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).