that defense has to be raised in the first response that is filed to the ComplaintWas it possible to raise it at the time when the complaint was not mentioning that the $41,100 that allegedly causes the unjust enrichment had been paid by means of a check to the order of my corporation ? Am I supposed to answer precisely to an allegation that is general ? It was just alleged thta the sum was disbursed to me.26. As a result, Plaintiff disbursed the remaining $41,100.00 to Defendants since theDefendants were soon to be owners for the Property.The evidence of the check itself was not pleaded until the trial hearing and the photocopy of the check was produced to me 3 days before the hearing. So I pleaded at the hearing that the Plaintiff was suing the wrong defendant and that because I was not the beneficiary of the check., Plaintiff failed to state a cause of action.In my answers to his complaint my lawyer had stated that the check was to refund previous works, which is correct , but again, I had no time to gather the documents of a corporation that i was no longer the CEO of at the trial hearing in anticipation that I had to represent the same corporation thta Plaintiff had failed to join as indispensable party.So my point is here that the mistake is in the final judgment to ignore the facts and to find thta I benefited of the unjust enrichment by assumption based on no evidence and despite my formal answer ( see above), and the facts could not be pleaded before the trial hearing ?Now here is my logic : this situation is equivalent to a situation of a default judgment on a case that fails to state a cause of action.What do you think ? Could my lawyer have asked me about the $41,100 check and then file a motion to strike the case for failure of stating a cause of action ? In theory, yes, in practice,no, because I took the decision to be hospitalized 3 months after the judge had initially dismissed the complain with leave to amend in 20 days. 3 months > 20 days and the plaintiff amended 4 months later without requesting leave to amend after the largely expired time, for any kind of reason
Ok, I get your point, thank you, but I am referring to a judicial mistake to assume at trial hearing that a check to the order of a Company is causing an unjust enrichment to one of its members, and for me to file a motion for relief 1.540 (b) against that to avoid the costs of appeal if possible, and otherwise appeal the order if denied and my grounds are solid of course ?
Thank you Lucy. Truly, this is very confusing to me, especially the "mistake of a party" so I will need to read some FL bar articles and law cases based on what you say, and ask you some further question a bit later here. Please bear with me.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).