Hello, and thank you for contacting Just Answer. I am an expert here and and I look forward to assisting you today.
The statute of limitations on your case would be six years from the date the malpractice occurred.
Maine is a little different than most states in that the statute specifically states that the statute of limitations is dated from the time the malpractice occurred, not when it is discovered.
The two statutes that set the SOL out in Maine are at http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/14/title14sec752.html and http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/14/title14sec753-B.html
Your facts are a little confusing as to when the malpractice occurred but if the actions that you are complaining of occurred over six years ago it would be barred.
The website is showing you are offline so I will exit so I can assist other customers. Please feel free to ask any follow up questions that you have in this thread. However, please don't issue a rating until our interaction is complete and all of your questions have been answered.
charges to my account have already been incurred. undo this transaction now . The website showing that I'm offline is wrong. Our interaction is complete until you do so. I will close my account before you get any money from me. I will be happy to pay you when you honor your statement that I will not be charged unless I am satisfied with my answer.
I'm not sure what you are referring to. Are you saying you are unsatisfied with my answer?
I am referring to the statement on this site that says " you will not be charged unless you are satisfied with your service" And, yes I am unsatisfied. I don't believe I left out anything pertinent.
As far as the billing, I have nothing to do with that and will notify the moderator. What I understand happens is that they put a "hold" on the funds you commit to but no withdrawal actually occurs but the website personnel will speak to you about that.
Can you explain why you are unsatisfied with the answer, since that is all I have control over? It is absolutely correct and I provided you the statutes which set forth the information that is a direct answer to your question.
Any additional info could be that the misrepresentation could not really be considered true until I had been granted my childrens' custody
this was a crime against my son. A child. not a sex crime but one that was committed resulting in his detriment.
By misrepresentation do you mean their failure to represent you properly or do you mean misrepresentation as in a lie?
His purpose was to protect my son, yet he recommended to the court that my son be placed in the protective physical custody of the perpetrator in this case instead of my custody. I was considered a possible risk of abuse but was not allowed to speak on my own behalf or on that of my son. He is responsible for almost 3 years of my son's mistreatment. I believe this constitutes misrepresentation, at best.
one thing more, if I could become satisfied enough with this service (which I am leaning toward), could you please do what you can to not charge my bank until June 4, 2013? Thank you!
This is a little different than what you first asked because the issue needs to be looked at differently.
Let me try and explain. As I said earlier, if it was over 6 years ago you wouldn't have a case. The Maine statute specifically states the statute of limitations against a lawyer starts running on the date of the action or omission, not when its effects are felt or when the mistake is discovered.
However, your son may have his own case against the ad litem and that statute of limitations wouldn't start until your son reached the age of 18.
He wouldn't have a cause of action against your lawyer, but the ad litem was acting as his lawyer (in a way) and therefore he gets a tolling period until he turns 18 although someone else could bring the lawsuit on his behalf before then.
As to the issue with the funds I don't have anything to do with that. I can certainly ask a moderator to contact you about it, which I will do.
Thank you! I want you to get paid your due earnings, but I couldn't do that quite yet.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).