paul here just real fast download, media fire, review fast!(this is his good draft)imo as your agreeing he was really doing a great job,
so, here it is again!
remember the 1st amend-complaint judge/only dismiss without prejudice,your even agreeing a month ago,was "very generous"of him,when he had to feasibly
see "something there"'but was not clear enough" ya know.
title="Laughing"/>i recall your agreeing to that!and again she file "THEN"pro-se,so i see why she feel in fear some,but she is DEFINITELY utilizing 99% here,and just review this and then i want you,to be able to really comment,on if she should mention about how this happen in beginning,and that etc. because i know all about;
ROOKER V.FELDMAN,learn this in 1st year of attempting to procure paralegal degree
B.A. many years ago and working at law firms
so ok i await your response,and remember:
1. (the spanking yes was affirm,she admit to light spanking)but was not overturned. (however)this was clearly NOT the reason the child was not return.
2. the"thirty three!(add-ons,and lies,and horrific,"as cited by THREE appeals in 04,(when case began)and throughout 09,order dyfs to fully investigate,all 33 "serious allegations"that WOULD be a reason yes,to bar a mother or father from the kid,but again this was not properly at any time"investigated"until 2010,int january 2011,
and executive order,then finally said,
"We OVERTURN all 33 allegations"as appeal order them to do this though,etc. investigate,or substantiate 04,07,09.understand?
Hence, was telling her how,your able to make sense of all this for her.
i think she should mention the appeal ordered this SINCE yes day one.
was"never done"and had it been investigated,adherence by caseworker
when three appeals said,"do it..."and yet fail to adhere,if cps did the child would have;
1. been reunited with mom,in the home;and or a regular visitation and parenting time weekly schedule"until reasonable effort(As required)by cps was applied,to return child in due time.
2.would have not been naturally put into a "rape"situation;repeat sex abuse and torture in 10 group homes!(and hospitalize paul.)
i await your response.
She is i think scared,because as your seeing atty.was wording it right
but she do not know how,and i am trying to help her with great answers
again as much as feasible,thank you.
oh! and lastly:
as your reviewing the attorney lawsuit,he institute for her,(well started to)
I am fairly certain,"After"i've review her past complaint,by her pro-se and
the DYFS D.A.G.(*deputy atty.gen.)the lawyer opposition mention this paul;
a third district as "other districts"preclude such suit of"this kind"because
your only able to file against a caseworker(s)etc. and or its agency itself
managerial etc;supervisory etc; IF "a wrong has been i.e. conviction was
later overturned,and or the state "Admit its wrongdoing"then your able to proceed,and he cite few case law(s) so if i am correct,a executive order
from the "same office"out of nj,whereas,attorney general cite,all of the
"un-investigated" 04-07 allegations,"After"1 spanking affirmation is now
OVERTURNED;listed as unfounded,against the mother.We now close your case january 2011.
isn't this supportive of her claim from (the beginning)of her case,if she decide to go this route,or at least"it should allow suit"on THIS claim to move forward,(this,meaning the mom claim on the fact,IF when she was cleared paul,officially,2010-2011,then there was"no reason"at all the child should have
NOT been reunited,with mother in home,of the mom understand?
Instead,cps left her homeless,at times(verify by dr. report and was lost int he system,supporting"homelessness"and as a result,(u know the rest)
awaiting your response thank you.
download "bob"draft,again thx.(link is above)