I was objecting and knew it was unfair at the time AND there was new information that made it even more unfair that came out after the fact. I kind of gave up arguing at the time since I was depressed and had been subjected to verbally abusive treatment from my spouse. I signed the whole with without any legal representation which was my real mistake.
In addition to that there was also new information that made it even worse around the valuation of real estate.
Thank you for your follow-up, Eric.The reason I asked is because generally contesting a divorce decree after the fact for being unfair is not really actionable and not likely to be successful. However, attacking the decree on basis of fraud and misrepresentation is quite possible. The difference here is based on the fact that if you can show that there was additional information which was not disclosed that would have materially changed your position toward the decree, the courts may agree to reopen the decree and potentially modify it. Then it is no longer simply a claim for unfairness but a claim for misrepresentation which the courts would see as a valid reason to reopen the claim. The fact that you signed without any sort of legal representation is not really a defense nor would the courts grant you the right to reopen on that basis alone, but if information was being hidden from you, then you have a basis to review. Just please be aware that reopening a decree is both expensive in legal fees and potentially uncertain as only about 15% of decrees get modified upon review. I am not telling you this to dissuade you, merely to provide you with odds so that you can choose to make the most educated decision for yourself going forward.Good luck.
Some of the information was misrepresented originally as well. This was information around assets falsely represented as being protected under a prenuptial agreement. How would that fit here?
Eric,So long as that misrepresentation was found after the decree, it can be brought up as grounds. But if you found out about these concerns before the divorce decree was signed, and you signed anyway, it is a non-issue. By signing the decree you would have waived your right to contest since by signing you did just that--the signing was done knowingly even if unfairly to you.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).