Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.I am genuinely sorry to hear that you are in this situation. A garnishment order is not an order that requires notice. Here is why:Garnishment only takes place where there is a judgment out against you. One a judgment is obtained, you are required to make the payments, and the judgment holder can ensure that those payments are made based on the terms of the agreement. In your case you have a legitimate argument that if language in your order designates otherwise, the other party is in violation and use that to take her back to court and remove the order. But otherwise the order is valid provided that the funds were not paid as granted by the language in the decree. Your situation is somewhat more serious since the other party is intentionally interfering, so taking her to court may not just be wise but be essential in this case. It may also permit you to remove the garnishment order out against you.Good luck.
the only reference in the divorce papers were that SDU would be used. nothing about going directly to my employer. in addition to this as I was not aware of this happening I was giving the ex a check every month for the same sum which she took with no comment. and cashed some.
yes. she kept some of the checks uncashed. she has not returned them. they went behind my back and my lawyer did not tell me either.
Dan,Thank you for your follow-up. Obtaining a direct payment via garnishment is not really against the law, and your attorney, at least as far as that goes, had no legal obligation to inform. If the language is absent in your decree, a garnishment is possible as it would not violate the language or the clauses in the agreement. Having said that, keeping the checks is simply theft and fraud. Take her to court and demand that she return the funds, or get the judge to allow you to withhold payments until the benefits she kept and your obligations match. This is no longer a simple misunderstanding but it is an intent to defraud, so dragging her back to court for contempt and for a formal order is not just in your best interest, it is the best option for you based on her past history and her current behavior.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).