Thank you for your clarification. Please understand how this works. Once someone hits you and they have insurance, the insurance is liable for the judgment that you'd get against the driver if you sue them (in limited amount, but usually pretty high). Ergo, to avoid paying out huge sums from a judgment where their driver is likely responsible, the insurance company likes to settle the claim to avoid litigation
. Once an agreement is reached, you sign a release and waive your rights to sue in exchange for the payout.
But, how does one reach that settlement? The insurance adjuster. The adjuster's job is to make you miserable. They may ignore you, confuse you, and ask for redundant and seemingly needless paperwork in an effort to talk you into a small settlement or have you give up all-together. And their offer will be little. Finally remember, statute of limitations
usually only gives you a limited time to file suit, which is TWO years per ARS 12-542.
. They know this; they hope you do not. If you miss the two year mark, you can no longer file against their driver, which means they do not even have to work with you.
What they are offering should at least cover:
1) all medical bills;
2) all bills for vehicle repair;
3) missed work; and
4) pain and suffering.
Not that they have to
, but because they know that you'll at least get that in Court. The last one (pain and suffering) is the wild card, and there is where they will try to avoid paying much.
The chiropractor is receiving their full payment because this is what they have charged to the insurance company. The insurance company is attempting to pay as little as possible, and is skimping off the top of their little offer to you to pay the chiropractor even more so. In other words, they are trying to take advantage of you. Once you accept that payment, the matter would be deemed finalized and you can no longer bring suit.
An attorney usually cuts through this malarkey since the adjuster knows counsel does not put up with this and WILL file suit if needed unless a decent settlement is offered (whereas here, they do not see you as much of a threat without an attorney since you filing or winning a suit without counsel is unlikely). Then a settlement is usually reached. The attorney should take this on a contingency basis, meaning they do not get paid unless you do. Usual set up is their take is 33% settlement, 40% win at trial, 45% at appeal; plus some office costs. Everything is negotiable.
May I recommend the AZ Bar referral programs - here
. The attorneys are vetted and qualified. You should be able to find an attorney you are confident with and whom you can trust, and who is available ASAP.
In the end, even with the attorney taking their percentage, one is still more likely to get MORE from the insurance company than one would if the matter is settled one's self without counsel.
I hope this helps and clarifies. Good luck.IMPORTANT
: Please use REPLY
button to keep chatting, or RATE
my answer when we are finished. Kindly rate my answer as one of the top three faces
before submitting the rating, because this is how I get credit for my time with you. Rating my answer the bottom two faces does not give me credit and reflects negatively on me as an expert, even if my answer is correct. I work very hard to formulate an informative and honest answer for you; please reciprocate my good faith. Do not worry, you may always ask follow ups for free after rating
. My ultimate goal is your complete satisfaction.