How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question

Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 86066
Experience:  JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Appeal Bond Amount. Are you available to continue a question

Resolved Question:

Appeal Bond Amount.

Are you available to continue a question from before?
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  Law Educator, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Thank you for asking for me. Yes we can continue.
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Thanks Paul,

 

I am sure you remember me with the JP appeal bond issue. Their attorney sent this email to mine talking about an " unopposed motion to increase bond amount" This is my response. Can you please tell me if it looks accurate and in your opinion would back him off of leaving the bond amount as is. The video link I provided is a TX House Business and industry committee meeting destroying the Texas Apartment Association Attorney that the rental concessions they are claiming are nothing but an illegal penalty. The word document doesn't seem to be working so here it is.

 

 

 

 

xxxx,

Thank you for the information and possible case law you cite as precedent. After conferring with my client as well as some colleagues we believe we also have found some different statutes as well some possible precedent rebutting your argument for the attorney fees. After further research it seems that the Courts are split on the inclusion of attorney’s fees to be calculated in the amount of the appeal bond. Here is one of the authorities for your review.Shook v. Walden, 304 S.W.3d 910 (Tex. App.–Austin 2010. I think a very important point included in this outcome is the fact that attorney fees were not calculated in the bond amount. Another conclusion from this case was that the amount of the bond was reduced initially due to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 52.006(a).

I realize you may have seen different cases reaching the opposite conclusion. I think that the most important proceeding going on now is a writ of mandamus proceeding in the Texas Supreme Court, In re Nalle Plastics Family Limited Partnership, No. 11-0903. While Appellate Courts are split on the decision, this is the first Supreme Court case on the issue. It looks like it was argued and post submission briefs filed but no ruling yet. Who knows when the ruling may come but there we feel there is a strong chance the ruling on the attorney fees with your motion will not succeed.

We will also remind the court that it was you that filed suit on my client, not the other way around. Another point we will raise is that the attorney fees are actually contingent on you prevailing in the trial de novo. It will also be made very clear that this is a breach of contract case, not an eviction proceeding. Your client is not currently incurring any damage in the form of lost rent. These forms of appeal bonds are already addressed in Texas Property Code §24.0053. In addition, the court will be reminded that if you would have lost in JP court, your cost would have been significantly less than ours to appeal to county court and to have the case tried in an actual court of record with an actual attorney as a judge to rule on the issues. I think we can both agree that you had one heck of a home court advantage in JP Court #6.

In addition, while reviewing the transcript of the trial for the Inability to Pay appeal of the initial JP appeal bond amount at the county court level with other colleagues, we have come upon some different statutes superseding the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure that were so heavily relied upon by you during that hearing. We believe that these statutes are much more applicable to this case. Although Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 571 defines the amount of the bond, we believe that particular statute is over ruled by these statutes:

Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code

§52.005. CONFLICT WITH TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. (a) To the extent that this chapter conflicts with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this chapter controls. (b) Notwithstanding Section 22.004, Government Code, the supreme court may not adopt rules in conflict with this chapter. (c) The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure apply to any proceeding, cause of action, or claim to which Section 52.002 does not apply.

§ 52.006. AMOUNT OF SECURITY FOR MONEY JUDGMENT. (a)
Subject to Subsection (b), when a judgment is for money, the amount of security must equal the sum of: (1) the amount of compensatory damages awarded in the judgment; (2) interest for the estimated duration of the appeal; and (3) costs awarded in the judgment. (b) Notwithstanding any other law or rule of court, when a judgment is for money, the amount of security must not exceed the lesser of: (1) 50 percent of the judgment debtor's net worth; or (2) $25 million. (c) On a showing by the judgment debtor that the judgment debtor is likely to suffer substantial economic harm if required to post security in an amount required under Subsection (a) or (b), the trial court shall lower the amount of the security to an amount that will not cause the judgment debtor substantial economic harm. (d) An appellate court may review the amount of security as allowed under Rule 24, Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, except that when a judgment is for money, the appellate court may not modify the amount of security to exceed the amount allowed under this section. (e) Nothing in this section prevents a trial court from enjoining the judgment debtor from dissipating or transferring assets to avoid satisfaction of the judgment, but the trial court may not make any order that interferes with the judgment debtor's use, transfer, conveyance, or dissipation of assets in the normal course of business.

As for the initial argument at trial regarding the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure being inapplicable to justice court cases, I believe that 52.005(a) is addressing specifically that. As you can see it clearly states that even the Supreme Court can not adopt rules that conflict with this chapter.
We believe that § 52.006 is important for several different reasons. First 52.006(a) addresses the fact that the Justice of the Peace appealed judgment is obviously a judgment for money. §52.006(b) We feel that this is a very important argument to your Appellate Rules not applying to JP decisions in the challenge of the initial Inability to Pay filing. JP Courts are obviously governed by the TXRCP. Black’s legal dictionary defines notwithstanding as “literally meaning irrespective of. “

Also if you refer to Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure rule 523 “ All rules governing the district and county courts shall also govern the justice courts, insofar as they

can be applied, except where otherwise specifically provided by law or these rules.” This is clearly a rule of court in JP court or even county court on appeal that the § 52.005 over rules.

For precedent we refer to McIntyre v. Ramirez,109 S.W.3d 741, 748 (Tex.2003); We are "not to second-guess the policy choices that inform our statutes or to weigh the effectiveness of their results; rather, our task is to interpret those statutes in a manner that effectuates the Legislature's intent." Also from McIntyre v. Ramirez “ In construing statutes, this Court starts with the plain language of the statute. “There are several more cases of precedent that we can cite but I believe we can both agree that it is well established that courts interpret statutes literally and will take into account what the legislative body was trying to accomplish with this statute. Please let me know if you need more precedent. Also I can send you the videos of the legislative meetings where they discuss putting in this statute specifically to guard against violating due process rights and guaranteeing the right to appeal. Justice of the Peace court has a $10,000 limit meaning that there is the possibility of having a $20,000 Appeal bond requirement before going to an actual court of record. That is definitely enough of a sum that it would impede most people from pursuing an appeal, thus violating the due process rights intended to be protected by this statute. This statute does not seem ambiguous, but if you plead that it is we will also rely on the following statute.

Texas Government Code

§ 311.023. STATUTE CONSTRUCTION AIDS. In construing a statute, whether or not the statute is considered ambiguous on its face, a court may consider among other matters the: (1) object sought to be attained; (2) circumstances under which the statute was enacted; (3) legislative history; (4) common law or former statutory provisions, including laws on the same or similar subjects; (5) consequences of a particular construction; (6) administrative construction of the statute; and (7) title (caption), preamble, and emergency provision. As we both know from the evidence presented at the hearing regarding my client’s financial situation we believe that your argument for an increase in the bond amount would definitely violate §52.006 (c). A bond amount that is set at approximately $8,000 would constitute an amount of money in excess of what my client makes after taxes in 3 months. That would obviously cause a substantial economic harm to my client, especially due to with the fact that he has a newborn daughter and a fiancé to provide for.

Please let me know what you want to do about the motion to increase the bond amount. Technically if you file this motion we could file a counter motion to reduce the bond amount based on the statute above and the fact that the almost $3,000 my client had to come up with in such a short amount of time has already caused substantial economic harm to my client. At this time your judgment is currently secured with the initial appeal bond provided. Our position is that we would like to avoid having to deal with another hearing and to minimize the burden and delays of more litigation and just set a date for trial.

In conclusion, I would like to remind you and your client of a demand letter sent to you last year about possible counter claims to your suit. I plan to file them soon. Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure §42.003 my client would like to again make an offer of settlement. To minimize the burden and delays of more litigation my client is again offering to settle for the amount of the alleged damages of approximately $302 including the 2 days of rent, alleged carpet damage, and final water bill that was never sent without the rental concession charges we are pleading as a illegal penalty clause. Of course we would deduct the $273 in filing fees at county court from the alleged charges minus the rental concessions. In agreement with this we agree to release and hold harmless your client for any counter claims we have the ability to pursue in this case as well as any attorney fees that were already incurred in this matter. I am sure that you are concerned about your compensatory attorney fees from the first trial. We obviously plan to argue these would not have been necessary if you would have given my client an opportunity to pay without immediately assessing the rental concessions, immediately increasing an approximately $300 bill to almost $1,200. This would avoid the possibility of setting precedent in the rental concession matter as a penalty as well. If you client has a counter offer for settlement, please let us know what they feel would be an acceptable compromise to avoid the burdens of further litigation. One thing we have recently noticed is that the xxx case in Waco has been set for submissions on briefs at The Court of Appeals and your oral argument has been denied. If you lose that case, won’t that be three (including two jury) trials that have now found you guilty of fraud with only the Supreme Court to go to for appeals? From what I have read of the case briefs, it appears the xxx’s have argued the same situation we are alleging in regards XXXXX XXXXX of the affirmative defenses such as fraud and estoppel. I have also included a link to a Committee meeting video from the Texas House Business and Industry Committee that I think you will find interesting. The discussion on rental concession clauses begins at approx. 2 hours and 58 minutes into the video. http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audio/committee-broadcasts/committee-archives/player/?session=81&committee=040&ram=90317a04t As far as a date for trial, my client is suggesting the days of the 17th and 18th of October if your client is unwilling to settle this matter. We feel this will provide enough time to get all discovery requests and information and pre trial motions taken care of. Please let me know your thoughts and what you would like to do from here. xxxxxx

 

 

 

 

Expert:  Law Educator, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Thank you for your response. Well written response. I have a couple of minor suggestions.

1) While Appellate Courts are split on the decision, this is the first Supreme Court case on the issue. It looks like it was argued and post submission briefs filed but no ruling yet. Who knows when the ruling may come but there we feel there is a strong chance the ruling on the attorney fees with your motion will not succeed.

Take out "I looks like it was argued and briefs filed. who knows when a ruling may come down..." Instead try:

"While Appellate Courts are split on the decision, this is the first Supreme Court case on the issue and we feel there is a strong chance the ruling on the attorney fees as with your motion will not succeed."

2) Take out "I think we can both agree that you had one heck of a home court advantage in JP Court #6." It is too controversial and accusatory.

3) Same with "One thing we have recently noticed is that the xxx case in Waco has been set for submissions on briefs at The Court of Appeals and your oral argument has been denied. If you lose that case, won’t that be three (including two jury) trials that have now found you guilty of fraud with only the Supreme Court to go to for appeals?" Tone this one down.

"We have noticed that the xxx case in Waco has been set for submission on briefs in the Court of Appeals and you lost the request for oral argument. It also seems that there have been two other cases you were involved in where the courts have found fraud. We intend on raising these issues as they were almost identical to my client's issues."


Other than those 3 things, the remainder of your arguments are good and strong as well.




Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking or you would like more information or you want to supply me with additional information to help you, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered using REPLY to EXPERT.

Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be researching your answer or working with other customers or I may be taking a break.

You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulmjd/ or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”

Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 86066
Experience: JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
Law Educator, Esq. and 14 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Thanks for your as usual great responses. Have an awesome night.

Expert:  Law Educator, Esq. replied 1 year ago.
Thank you. In these letters, you need to avoid personal attacks and allegations wherever possible and keep the tone as professional as possible.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 86066
Experience: JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
Law Educator, Esq. and 14 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Last | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it. Lee Michigan
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Tina's Avatar

    Tina

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8201
    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/MU/multistatelaw/2011-11-27_173951_Tinaglamourshotworkglow102011.64x64.jpg Tina's Avatar

    Tina

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8201
    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RA/ratioscripta/2012-6-13_2955_foto3.64x64.jpg Ely's Avatar

    Ely

    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    19419
    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/FL/FLAandNYLawyer/2012-1-27_14349_3Fotolia25855429M.64x64.jpg FiveStarLaw's Avatar

    FiveStarLaw

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    8122
    25 years of experience helping people like you.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/jespoag/2008-12-17_222355_jessepic.jpg JPEsq's Avatar

    JPEsq

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    2131
    Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/gsenmartin/2008-04-22_214950_me1.jpg Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.'s Avatar

    Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    83
    7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/PA/PaulmoJD/2013-10-10_195858_JAImage.64x64.jpg Law Educator, Esq.'s Avatar

    Law Educator, Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    30758
    JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/dkaplun/2009-05-17_173121_headshot_1_2.jpg Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    15340
    Multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation and administration.