Thanks for your follow up.You would state that you are seeking damages based on conversion including punitive damages, or something to that effect.You would be seeking punitive damages here for say conversion but not under 768.72 because the statute doesn't allow for them.
You are wanting to add a claim for civil conversion here separate and distinct from 768.72 without referring to it because if you remember no punitive damages under this particular statute only treble ones.
I must have missed something previously on this issue. Under what statute does Punitive apply to Conversion, Tortious Interference, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Contract and Unlawful Acts and Practices?
Is conversion covered by the same rules as Civil Theft? I know that Civil Theft has no provision for Punitive.
Each of these claims is going to have a separate cause or claim.For instance you would claim the same events were not only civil theft under the section you reference but then in a separate section alternately plead there was say a breach of contract.In that paragraph you would state something to the effect that plaintiff alleges that the parties entered into a contract on the ---day of --and that said contract required defendant to do x and that defendant breached that contract.As a result plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of...Plaintiff would further show that defendants acts were intentional and warrant punitive damages.
Then you can claim in the next paragraph that plaintiff claims alternately without waiving the foregoing that defendant has committed civil coversion.Plaintiff alleges that defendant did y and that these were intentional acts and warrant both actual and punitive damages.
Breach of contract reference.
I think I have that part; but I have a separate count for the list I mentiond above. The same acts constitute Conversion, Civil Theft, Unjust Enrichment.
Thats right the facts are the same here but they may support each of these claims and damages for each one.
Here is an order that goes through the laundry list and may help you here too.
So then would not a separate claim for punitive damages be appropriate with each count?
With the ones that allow it--anyone other than the civil theft one pursuant to the 768.72 there you are claiming treble damages pursant to that specific statute.
Here is good summary of breach of contract.
Sorry for my thick head, but I think we're saying the same thing. Civil Theft specifically prohibits punitive, but each of the others can accept it. Thanks for the links, looks very helpful, too.
Thanks for letting me help.Have a great weekend.
It has been my pleasure to assist you today.
Please remember to rate my service once you have all the information you need. If you have any other questions, please ask me – I’ll be happy to respond. Thank you again for letting me help you !!
Answers given are for informational purposes only .
Ray, I read the ruling in the NYESA COSTA RICA v. WILSON CAPITAL, and find many similar issues between it and the instant matter I was asking about. Would punitive damages be allowed on the Fraud, Conversion and Unjust Enrichment of that case, and if so, why is it not mentioned?
They would you just need to prove and plead them here and not reference the civil theft statute.They are separate alternate things you can plead as causes of action.This gives you multiple chances at damages.Thanks for letting me clarify this for you.I appreciate the chance to do so and your patience.
Thanks for your patience.
In order to claim unjust enrichment, you have a contract implied in law to exist in a particular case, the defendant must have received a benefit or been unjustly enriched, and should be required to compensate the plaintiff. No property interest is necessary here. It is sufficient to establish that a defendant received a benefit.
Here also a plaintiff must also prove that he or she has exhausted all direct remedies against any other party, with whom he or she is in privity of contract, prior to pursuing any indirect equity claim against a defendant whom he or she claims has been unjustly enriched by his or her services or by goods you have provided to the defendant.
You are so welcome, hope this helps too.
To prevail in your case on a theory of unjust enrichment a plaintiff must plead the following elements to the court here:
The defendant has knowledge of the benefit;
The defendant has accepted or retained the benefit conferred; and
Regarding civil fraud, the essential elements are: (a) a false representation of fact, known by the party making it to be false at the time it was made; (b) that the representation was made for the purpose of inducing another to act in reliance on it; (c) actual reliance on the representation; and (d) resulting damage to the Plaintiff.
Thanks for the extra effort. I have most of this down pretty good, but appreciate your reiterating it; there was also excellent details in the Federal Judge's ruling in the Nyesa Costa case, spelling out the prerequisites for each cause. So your links have all been super helpful.Best regards, again.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).