Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
PLEASE NOTE WELL WE ARE DEALING WITH LAWS OF 50 STATES PLUS FEDERAL LAWS, AS WELL AS DEALING WITH OTHER CUSTOMERS, SO PLEASE BE PATIENT AND BE ASSURED YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED.
There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be taking a break.
You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulmjd/ or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”
Thanks. I assume there are enought time (a month from now) to subpoena them. I assume they are obligated. What is some of them cite reason like sick? Do they have to show in person? Also, will the plaintiff and defendant be at the hearing in person as well? Could the defendant use any reason such as sickness to change the hearing date? By the way, I should assume this is the only hearing to prepare all document, witness not a FIRST hearing. right?
Just one more quick clearance.
Per the last sentence of your response, if this hearing is only about default judgement and no witness required, then my attorney does not subpoena the wintess (i.e. the doctor and investigator) and have them appear in court. Or I need to clarify what the hearing about. As far as I know, this hearing is scheduled due to defendant's motion of "not proper served". I may be focus on collecting the service document
(sheriff, special baliffs and warning order attorney) to prove the service appropriate. If this is what about then the wintness will be sheriff, speical bailiff and warning order attorney, not doctor/government investigator. I heard even if the services were done correctly, it is still up to judge to decide rule as default judgement or not. If not, then
further witness for prove of fraud etc will be in next hearing. I may need to clarify this from court, right?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).